Sign in or 

|
sarahwannabe |
Latest page update: made by sarahwannabe
, Jun 23 2009, 5:21 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
985 words added 3 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trigger_happy14 | The Question and Answer Thread (NEW FANS PLEASE CLICK <--) (page: 1 2) | 28 | Feb 25 2009, 11:48 AM EST by spear401 | ||
|
Thread started: Feb 14 2009, 5:20 AM EST
Watch
Well, I realized we get a lot of repeat threads filled with questions that have been answered numerous times so I thought it'd be good idea to have a thread that kinda organizes these questions for any of the newer fans.
So if you've got a question that needs to be answered post it here! I'll also make a list of "unanswered questions" so people will know what has truly been answered and what's really just speculation! So... here we go! SEASON 1 COMMON QUESTIONS: 1) Why is Cameron so human-like in the Pilot, but seemingly reverts to a clueless robot in Gnothi Seauton? Answer: There are actually 2 answers to this. If you are willing to take it in the context of the plot, the OFFICIAL ANSWER straight from the mouth of Josh Friedman himself is that Cameron had a specific mission in the Pilot; get close to John. So after her identity was compromised by Cromartie's attack, there was no reason to pretend to be a human anymore. The second answer has to do with the tweeking of the writing after the Pilot. Apparently, Cameron's character was changed a bit after the Pilot, hence the change in character. Actually, the Gnothi Seauton was filmed months after the Pilot and is pretty common in TV where Pilots are very different then what the rest of the show is. 2) How did Cromartie's head follow the Connors through the time displacement field if it didn't have any flesh? Answer: Another annoying nitpick that has been answered directly by the writers/producers. The head actually had flesh around it as it went through, it just "burned off." The SFX crew had to "sensor" it in a way so that this wasn't visible on scene as it is somewhat gratuitous. |
|||||
| samosapowis | catherine weaver (how?) | 5 | Feb 15 2009, 12:34 PM EST by samosapowis | ||
|
Thread started: Feb 14 2009, 7:24 PM EST
Watch
On this lovely wiki site they discribe catherine weaver terminator as being a T1001 an updated version to the T1000 in T2. i've been told that there are no episodes that explain this fact, where did the peeps from this place get there info?
|
|||||