Writer's Blog



TSCC Blog
Behind-the-scenes, easter eggs, writers' notes, and fan questions along with answers from Friedman and the writers (no spoilers).

Check the blog daily for updates from the writers of TSCC.



This is your direct link to those involved with TSCC, specifically the writers, and they will want to hear from you. Don’t be shy — leave comments, open conversations, send them links, tell your friends and robots.

With Season 2 now at a full 22-episode run, the writers will share TSCC inside information with you (always spoiler-free, of course). This will include the first ever official Sarah Connor podcast.


Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles Writers

Dan Thomsen
Ian Goldberg
Ashley Miller
Zack Stentz
Toni Graphia
Natalie Chaidez
John Wirth
Denise Thé
Josh Friedman


Click here to jump to the blog. Hit your browser's back page to return to this wiki.


sugarboots
sugarboots
Latest page update: made by sugarboots , Nov 7 2008, 5:43 PM EST (about this update About This Update sugarboots Moved from: Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles Wiki - sugarboots

No content added or deleted.

- complete history)
Keyword tags: tscc blog writers
More Info: links to this page
(Showing the last 5 of 27 - view all)
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
tx5104n Suggestions To Improve The Show (page: 1 2) 26 Monday, 7:03 PM EST by joe33087
tx5104n
Thread started: Oct 13 2008, 11:20 AM EDT  Watch
The show needs to be darker!

As some of you may know, the original Terminator movies were conceived from an idea James Cameron had after a nightmare about an invisible robotic assassin sent from the future to kill him. I strongly believe the nightmare was an important contributer to Cameron's 'vision' of the story - it made him a part of it. The non-Cameron Terminators seem almost fluffy in comparison. These new directors don't give me the feeling that the world is going to end. Don't get me wrong, I love the series! It is entertaining and the stories are intriguing. However, you should change some stuff to bring back the feeling I so desperately long for - fear of an impending demise.

Here's how you could do that:

1. Use cooler, blue tones in most shots, yellowish-green hues in desert and outdoor scenes with direct sunlight, lower the saturation a bit and increase contrast. The scenes are too colorful and bright, which makes me feel happy. I don't want a world with terminators in it to make me feel happy.
2. Don't make the product placement of the truck so obvious. I mean, seriously?
3. Make me emotionally invested in in at least one of the people dying. The only characters to die have been underdeveloped.
4. Sarah should be influenced more by the events in the movies.
5. Cameron should be more threatening and tactful, even while malfunctioning.
6, Stop using that cheesy slow-motion effect. The picture gets too choppy and is actually drawing attention away from the subject matter rather than emphasizing it.
7. The T-1000's morphing is too smooth and bright (It looks cheap).

As I mentioned, the show is fine the way it is, and I will continue watching. Nevertheless, changing a few minor things to make the show darker would most definitely increase viewer engrossment and appeal to a larger, more mature audience.

Samuel R. Sloan
5  out of 13 found this valuable. Do you?    
Show Last Reply
tx5104n How About Some Ideas? 10 Monday, 5:25 PM EST by tx5104n
tx5104n
Thread started: Monday, 5:45 AM EST  Watch
Respond to this this thread with some unique ideas for the show. Perhaps the writers will see something they could use. :)

My ideas:

1. Creepy-crawly terminators. These terminators are used mostly for stealth missions and data gathering, but can also be used as bombs to take out bridges, vehicles, and anything else they can latch onto. Imagine a large robotic centipede or spider that can latch onto a person's body and then explode (bye-bye head)! I think smaller terminators could be just as scary as large ones. These terminators could also be fired from specially-designed guns.

2. Aquatic Terminators. Used for warfare in or on water, these eel-like terminators can move through the water faster than you can say, "Skippy, there be trouble." Their quick and agile maneuverability in the water makes these terminators perfect for locating or planting mines or tracking human marine activity. They can also take out small boats in a similar fashion as the insect terminators (see previous idea).

3. Perhaps Sarah never contracts cancer and dies. It could all be a cover to protect herself and to ensure John's survival. She could play a more important role in the survival of mankind than what we have been led to believe.

Okay, so those are my ideas. Now let's hear some of yours! Remember, this isn't a critique. Don't comment on other people's ideas. Just contribute your own. Have fun, and use your imagination.
Do you find this valuable?    
Show Last Reply
Nicromonger hey guys help me out abit (page: 1 2) 24 Monday, 2:30 PM EST by sanescience
Nicromonger
Thread started: Oct 17 2008, 5:07 AM EDT  Watch
Hey guys help me out here I’ve always wondered about this:

Lets say if you are in the future and you go back and fix the past like what Sarah and johns doing , the future must change right? So if john destroy the program that started everything then there wont be any Cameron or terminator and maybe there wont even be a time machine , then we can say john would never exist right? ….

The shows really great but I keep on wondering about that ,, lets say the “ turk program” don’t get destroyed in time I think that’s the case right now, ,correct me if im wrong ok . but then there must still be something in place to update john on his mission and objectives
Either there must be some1 that goes back and from the future to update him or maybe Cameron has a “comm. System in place to receive messages from the future something like that

I haven’t watch the second season yet bc im stuck in a third world at the moment so maybe my answers awaits me in the second season ?

Also u can actually say that this show can interlink with the matrix ….am I wrong to think like that?

Ohh yes and before I forget ! we all know the robots soul purpose is to destroy the human being because they are competing against us for “first price” …. So why will they only copy human forms to achieve their mission ? if I where the master mind behind the robots I would make little robots that look like rats to spy on the humans in their bunkers , I would make birds and send them back to the past to check out on its mistakes ex if those robots are so advance to upgrade themselves the whole time why can’t they make a deadly gas an pump it into the atmosphere to destroy all humans ?



I think the “game concept “ in the show is very interesting and it should be brought in more , I mean winning and losing making better moves than the previous move that’s what it is all about I think ?
2  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: john sarah turk
Show Last Reply
sanescience Yeay for good writing. Time is hard to get right. 1 Monday, 1:32 PM EST by johnicon1
sanescience
Thread started: Monday, 1:28 PM EST  Watch
As a science enthusiast writer wannabe I always appreciate writing that tries to at least get general science principles correct and not stray into complete science fantasy. Yes, yes, purists object to time travel in general. But it does make for fun stories and thought experiments.

The best model that has a chance at not completely blowing logic to pieces is the Endless Quantum Realities (EQR) idea. Or that time travel actually represents a kind of lateral movement into realities that seem the same but that have progressed temporally at a different rate than our own (slower for the past, faster for the future).

This makes "sense" because a whole range of causality paradox issues are no longer problems. Anything you do does not effect your memory (or existence) as the reality of your origin remains unchanged. If you were to kill your mother, it just prevents a "version" of you in that reality from existing, And within any given reality the past is stable and does not morph before an observers eyes. I.e. no parts of photographs fading in or out of existence. Also, you can meet versions of yourself or others from realities that do not match your own memories. And information developed from one reality can be brought to another reality and used to construct what appears to be the origin of that object (an apparent paradox but not actually.) It also supports the "no fate" assertion that might otherwise seem contradicted by a future that has "already happened".

However, there is a kind of zen problem in EQR for certain types of characters. The realization that if your trying to prevent something from happening all your really doing is changing how one of an infinite number of realities might play out. It also presents an interesting question about what a machine that understands EQR is trying to accomplish by traveling back in time.

More later, out of charac

1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Show Last Reply
billmillier Just to Clarify 2 Dec 9 2008, 2:36 PM EST by billmillier
billmillier
Thread started: Dec 7 2008, 10:54 AM EST  Watch
First, I admit I came to that conclusion by myself, and i also find some of the approach theories discussed here quite interesting. Though im still not sure if a relationship between John & Cameron is such a great idea this early in the series, i wouldn't dismiss the potential story development that could evolve by taking that direction (i'd pay good money to see Sarah's face when she finds out her son is (censored) the machine, hehe, sorry couldn't help it). I feel I should clarify that my point wasn't exactly to enfasize the debate over whether Cameron is self-aware or not, but instead, to explore the reaction other members of the group would have based on this unexpected and unforeseen new development, after all you almost can blindely trust a machine -to a point and when its not misbehaving due to a chip malfunction anyway- but how would them react to basically having another 'nearly-human' around, taking into consideration Cameron's abilities and a well known hidden agenda?. Besides, im convinced that present John refuses to completely 'bond' with Cameron because he sees her as a sofisticated computer (looks notwithstanding), and pursuing something more could be seen as freaky, but hey, if she can really feel then... And, maybe, if you wanna turn back the clock, at the end of the episode -As a twist- you could explain it was all an internal VR simulation cameron was conducting to explore an escenario where she tells everyone the truth allowing her to ponder wheter is a good strategic move or not for them to find who she really is.

Greets to All!
BILL (From Argentina)
http://www.bmbusiness.com.ar
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: cameron john
Show Last Reply
(Showing the last 5 of 27 - view all)

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)