Sign in or 

|
CuthbertAllgood |
40. RE: Explain please
Nov 30 2008, 11:10 AM EST
"One more thing,Canon for Cameron, but we shall see what the writers of TSCC will do. I don't think they'll follow the events of T2-3D. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Mat-101 |
41. RE: Explain please
Nov 30 2008, 2:48 PM EST
"Skynet was concerned that the T-1000/T-X models had the capability of becoming self-aware. Making too many of these things raised the odds of this happening. Of all the Terminators Skynet was churning out, these prototype models were a threat not only to John and Sarah Connor, but Skynet as well."True for the T-1000, but not nessesarily so for the T-X. The T-X had a CPU, putting in more in line obedience-wise with the earlier '900 and '800s. Plus, there is nothing to indicate it was a prototype. Do you find this valuable? |
|
CuthbertAllgood |
42. RE: Explain please
Nov 30 2008, 2:51 PM EST
"True for the T-1000, but not nessesarily so for the T-X. The T-X had a CPU, putting in more in line obedience-wise with the earlier '900 and '800s. Plus, there is nothing to indicate it was a prototype."Everybody forgets that even the T800 have blocks because Skynet didn't want them to become self aware or too indipendent. Do you find this valuable? |
|
SamStaurophobia |
43. RE: Explain please
Nov 30 2008, 6:24 PM EST
"Everybody forgets that even the T800 have blocks because Skynet didn't want them to become self aware or too indipendent."The red vision is indicative of this. :) The only question is when Cromartie's blocks are removed at the end of 2.08, why does he still try to kill John (his moving trigger finger)? Is it because he WANTS to? Do you find this valuable? |