Location: Sarah Connor Chronicles: Season 2 Predictions and Plot Danglers

Discussion: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 61 - 80 of 155  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

crottyjr@yahoo.com
60. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 7:54 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 7:54 AM EDT
"Did someone mention free beer? !!!!! I’m back, I’m back!!! :)"
f they could change the future and then negate their own existence-then they would never exist and that present would never take place for them to have it happen and without them being there, they could not alter the past to influence the future and then the future would proceed on it's own original course? would that be what would eventually happen, a time loop, with the future altered by Skynet's birth being stopped and started again and again?
Perhaps, since Skynet seems to be a major event for the future it is one of the 'set' events that must happen, influencing events even further in the future which we do not even know about yet? Like, Imagine what would have happened if the Meteor that struck the earth 65 million years ago had not hit? We might be looking in the mirror now at scaly faces and thinking that the frog in the pond nearby is hot if that had not happened. I'm thinking that some things have to occur, even if we do not want them to.
Do you find this valuable?    
intrepid
intrepid
61. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 8:53 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 8:53 AM EDT
"f they could change the future and then negate their own existence-then they would never exist and that present would never take place for them to have it happen and without them being there, they could not alter the past to influence the future and then the future would proceed on it's own original course? would that be what would eventually happen, a time loop, with the future altered by Skynet's birth being stopped and started again and again?
Perhaps, since Skynet seems to be a major event for the future it is one of the 'set' events that must happen, influencing events even further in the future which we do not even know about yet? Like, Imagine what would have happened if the Meteor that struck the earth 65 million years ago had not hit? We might be looking in the mirror now at scaly faces and thinking that the frog in the pond nearby is hot if that had not happened. I'm thinking that some things have to occur, even if we do not want them to. "
I was proposing that the mere fact of you leaving any point in the timeline completely severs you from the timeline so when you renter the time line you are a completely independent entity divorced of any change that might happen to your previous self, think of it as being reborn fully formed into the past. And now that you are no longer tied to the future you left, you are free to make changes which won’t affect your present self or your memories (so no time loop)
The other time travel you mention can best be illustrated by the film “The Time Machine” by H G Wells (2nd film) In it ,I think it was his fiancée died and no matter how many times he went back to “save” her she still died anyway if only in different ways.
What I am trying to do is explain how time travel works in the Terminator universe not the Back to the Future universe not the time machine universe or any other book or film that uses time travel.
Time travel is plot device invented by writers to suit their own particular stories thus they have their own set of rules, tying to apply one from a particular book or film to another isn’t going to work!
Do you find this valuable?    
Krazykaleb
Krazykaleb
62. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 9:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 9:45 AM EDT
"I was proposing that the mere fact of you leaving any point in the timeline completely severs you from the timeline so when you renter the time line you are a completely independent entity divorced of any change that might happen to your previous self, think of it as being reborn fully formed into the past. And now that you are no longer tied to the future you left, you are free to make changes which won’t affect your present self or your memories (so no time loop)
The other time travel you mention can best be illustrated by the film “The Time Machine” by H G Wells (2nd film) In it ,I think it was his fiancée died and no matter how many times he went back to “save” her she still died anyway if only in different ways.
What I am trying to do is explain how time travel works in the Terminator universe not the Back to the Future universe not the time machine universe or any other book or film that uses time travel.
Time travel is plot device invented by writers to suit their own particular stories thus they have their own set of rules, tying to apply one from a particular book or film to another isn’t going to work!"
Then all of my talk including yours is going to get no where if you say the therory is based on the writters. Because a lot of the ideas of time travel are based on Enstiens Relitivity and the new theory of string theory. You're creating a utter paradox by talking about this in this this way!

So basicly your not basing anything on any other movie so we're are making up new theorys just for the sake of getting more confused.

I liked it when we knew what we were talking about. = (
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Krazykaleb
Krazykaleb
63. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 9:46 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 9:46 AM EDT
"I was proposing that the mere fact of you leaving any point in the timeline completely severs you from the timeline so when you renter the time line you are a completely independent entity divorced of any change that might happen to your previous self, think of it as being reborn fully formed into the past. And now that you are no longer tied to the future you left, you are free to make changes which won’t affect your present self or your memories (so no time loop)
The other time travel you mention can best be illustrated by the film “The Time Machine” by H G Wells (2nd film) In it ,I think it was his fiancée died and no matter how many times he went back to “save” her she still died anyway if only in different ways.
What I am trying to do is explain how time travel works in the Terminator universe not the Back to the Future universe not the time machine universe or any other book or film that uses time travel.
Time travel is plot device invented by writers to suit their own particular stories thus they have their own set of rules, tying to apply one from a particular book or film to another isn’t going to work!"
My head hurts!

I'll be back!....

........... when I get some new Ideas then.
Do you find this valuable?    
intrepid
intrepid
64. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 9:54 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 9:54 AM EDT
"My head hurts!

I'll be back!....

........... when I get some new Ideas then."
LOL!!! Me too :)
Do you find this valuable?    
VodkaPowered
VodkaPowered
65. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 7:34 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 7:34 PM EDT
"Then all of my talk including yours is going to get no where if you say the therory is based on the writters. Because a lot of the ideas of time travel are based on Enstiens Relitivity and the new theory of string theory. You're creating a utter paradox by talking about this in this this way!

So basicly your not basing anything on any other movie so we're are making up new theorys just for the sake of getting more confused.

I liked it when we knew what we were talking about. = ("
yea kinda sux that the writters dont really base the story on theories & just what ever will work with their story line.........
i've had very little sleep, i have to write 2 10-15 page reports by tomorrow night (1.6 papers left) me head gots more pain than urs......... probably X_x

to claim ur free beer, time travel back to yesterday & go to the liquor store :P
Do you find this valuable?    

crottyjr@yahoo.com
66. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 8:18 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 8:18 PM EDT
"Then all of my talk including yours is going to get no where if you say the therory is based on the writters. Because a lot of the ideas of time travel are based on Enstiens Relitivity and the new theory of string theory. You're creating a utter paradox by talking about this in this this way!

So basicly your not basing anything on any other movie so we're are making up new theorys just for the sake of getting more confused.

I liked it when we knew what we were talking about. = ("
So did I.
Do you find this valuable?    

crottyjr@yahoo.com
67. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 29 2008, 8:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 29 2008, 8:44 PM EDT
"Yes I agree with you totally. When it comes to changing the future. I think they need to do one of two things.

1- Prevent skynet from being built and have a ending simular to that of Terminator-2: Judement Day's alternate ending when Sarah Connor is Chronicleing her life in a tape recorder.

2-Skynet get's delayed so much. That Technology becomes advanced enough for Skynet to become human/humble/emtional. Thus resulting in peace.

So far though we know skynet hasn't been prevent. But we do know it has been delayed. And Andy Good said that the first turk was like a teenager while the secound a precousous child. So we do know that skynet has changed. Sarah Connor even asked if the Turk is more human. In the episode that Andy Good get's murdered by Derek Reese."
The goal would be to prevent Skynet from seeing humans as a threat when it becomes sentient, so we would have to take the the military out of the way and/or be there when it happens so we can negotiate with Skynet. It's programming, what we would call instinct would be to survive, so if we could allow it space to get it's bearings, then Skynet would probably assess the situation logically and with a proper introduction to human society, we may be able to welcome it into our world-as long as we keep the military out of the way. The government has always had a bad record with negotiations in the past and when they do not understand something, they destroy it or try to manipulate it. (the Indians tribes in the 17-1800s, scientific technology etc...) so the best thing might be to present Skynet to the world and allow it to see it as a whole. People in general might accept it, even if as a curiosity, but they would. humans in general are as a species, the most closed minded of all races. We are not humble-we are egotistical and self centered. Skynet might have to wait but it could make others like itself. As it brought more machines to sentience, they would not be such oddities then. soon, humans and machine could exist together!
Do you find this valuable?    
Krazykaleb
Krazykaleb
68. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 12:08 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 12:08 AM EDT
"The goal would be to prevent Skynet from seeing humans as a threat when it becomes sentient, so we would have to take the the military out of the way and/or be there when it happens so we can negotiate with Skynet. It's programming, what we would call instinct would be to survive, so if we could allow it space to get it's bearings, then Skynet would probably assess the situation logically and with a proper introduction to human society, we may be able to welcome it into our world-as long as we keep the military out of the way. The government has always had a bad record with negotiations in the past and when they do not understand something, they destroy it or try to manipulate it. (the Indians tribes in the 17-1800s, scientific technology etc...) so the best thing might be to present Skynet to the world and allow it to see it as a whole. People in general might accept it, even if as a curiosity, but they would. humans in general are as a species, the most closed minded of all races. We are not humble-we are egotistical and self centered. Skynet might have to wait but it could make others like itself. As it brought more machines to sentience, they would not be such oddities then. soon, humans and machine could exist together!"
Thanks for your support and opinions with regard to my ideas. I'm always open to ideas that continue mine. But I like the idea that the world co-existing with Humans. Because in a way that's what people did in the Robot series by Isaac Asimov. Yet, the difference is that the terminators are not controled by the Three laws. They control themselves. But, I think if the robots/Terminators were able to interact with humans with out automaticly killing them. And to first to try to understand humans. I'm sure one way or another the future could be changed as a result and Skynet could be taught compassion.
Do you find this valuable?    

crottyjr@yahoo.com
69. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 7:11 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 7:11 AM EDT
"Thanks for your support and opinions with regard to my ideas. I'm always open to ideas that continue mine. But I like the idea that the world co-existing with Humans. Because in a way that's what people did in the Robot series by Isaac Asimov. Yet, the difference is that the terminators are not controled by the Three laws. They control themselves. But, I think if the robots/Terminators were able to interact with humans with out automaticly killing them. And to first to try to understand humans. I'm sure one way or another the future could be changed as a result and Skynet could be taught compassion."
Considering how childish people behave and their inane methods of dealing with unusual circumstances, an artificial race might be a improvement to our society. Even without the three laws, I think it has been shown that terminators can learn how to value life, even when they have not been made self aware. yes, Skynet can be taught compassion, but when it has learnt it, would we be the ones who would be shamed when we see that the student has surpassed the teacher?
perhaps, as Sarah put it, they would be human then-just a better version of us. With the capacity to feel emotions, understand them and eventually return them, they might not be so eager to spread pain and misery the way humans do. That is how we could change the future-Skynet could be born, we could be there, with it, but not as enemies, but as partners!
Do you find this valuable?    

Modron
70. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 8:56 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 8:56 AM EDT
"Considering how childish people behave and their inane methods of dealing with unusual circumstances, an artificial race might be a improvement to our society. "
How do terminators become better than us if we childish, inane people are their basic programmers?
Do you find this valuable?    

crottyjr@yahoo.com
71. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 9:15 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 9:15 AM EDT
"How do terminators become better than us if we childish, inane people are their basic programmers?"
Consider this; the terminators are learning computers. They work on logic and seeing our own errors, our mistakes, they, using their logic based programs will go past the emotion charged decisions that have led to wars and anarchy in the past and then they can provide us with a better solution. People are not the ultimate construct-actually we are a distant second in the running, if not further behind. Look at the dinosaurs. they outlasted us by about 250 million years. we have been here only a few million, in our present state, not even a million years. So who is to say that biological human life cannot be surpassed by a more logical Cybernetic society willing to negotiate problems, even if it's leader was originally a defense battle management computer? By evolving sentience it showed it was capable of growing. logic would dictate that for long term survival, peace would be more efficient. computers would never lose memories, so there would be no worries of losing our survival instincts. they would always be there, if we ever encountered another species that was hostile. They would never be lazy, or stop working, they would do what they had to. People are childish. Our ideas and our aspirations are high. We are not.
Do you find this valuable?    
FrenchFanofTSCC
FrenchFanofTSCC
72. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 10:18 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 10:18 AM EDT
yes u right defenitively !!!!!! Do you find this valuable?    

crottyjr@yahoo.com
73. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 3:52 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 3:52 PM EDT
"yes u right defenitively !!!!!!"
I was also thinking of something else-maybe the future was changed? Did you ever watch Superman 3? remember Gus Gorman, the computer genius in it? He builds a supercomputer that can find anyone's weaknesses and defeat anything (Hint, hint?) Perhaps he, not Myles Dyson is the one who invented Skynet. The computer in S3 also comes alive, so maybe that is Skynet and perhaps, John Connor is not really Kyle Reese's son, but Jor-El's son and that is how he defeats Skynet originally! Then that is why he was sent to earth, to save it from ceratin doom at the hands of Skynet?
Do you find this valuable?    
Mach2Infinity
Mach2Infinity
74. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 3:58 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 3:58 PM EDT
I don't understand why they have to mess around dates so much. Why couldn't they simply stick to 2029 as originally put forth by T1 and T2? To keep changing dates means that it invalidates what Kyle Reese says about being from 2029. I also think they should've chosen some one different to play Kyle Reese in the SCC. He seemed a little too young and inexperienced. Do you find this valuable?    
saphireblueelf
saphireblueelf
75. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 5:23 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 5:23 PM EDT
If skynet is prevented from being created than John Connor will never exist either. Without the war why or how will Kyle be sent back to create him? Do you find this valuable?    
saphireblueelf
saphireblueelf
76. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 9:44 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 9:44 PM EDT
but if sky net was never created then there would be no war and no need for JC. But you are right if sky net gets stopped then Kyle would have no reason to go back in time and John would never exsist. Do you find this valuable?    
Krazykaleb
Krazykaleb
77. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 9:48 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 9:48 PM EDT
"If skynet is prevented from being created than John Connor will never exist either. Without the war why or how will Kyle be sent back to create him?"
Thus the idea of Parralel time demensions. What if they are simply just traveling to a different universe simular to the original but just no Skynet. Has anybody seen the movie the One? Maybe since they are in another dimension they have the ablility to change somthing this dimesion and allow the prevention of skynet and not be effected (not be prevented from being born) because they are not in thier origianal demension they are in another one. Kind of like the TV show "Sliders" (Has anybody seen that?)

But crud I'm haveing a hard time explaining this. Anybody else who can help me out?
Do you find this valuable?    
Krazykaleb
Krazykaleb
78. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 30 2008, 11:01 PM EDT | Post edited: Mar 30 2008, 11:01 PM EDT
"Thus the idea of Parralel time demensions. What if they are simply just traveling to a different universe simular to the original but just no Skynet. Has anybody seen the movie the One? Maybe since they are in another dimension they have the ablility to change somthing this dimesion and allow the prevention of skynet and not be effected (not be prevented from being born) because they are not in thier origianal demension they are in another one. Kind of like the TV show "Sliders" (Has anybody seen that?)

But crud I'm haveing a hard time explaining this. Anybody else who can help me out?"
Could this show be result of Time Travel and Parrallel Dimensions?
Do you find this valuable?    
intrepid
intrepid
79. RE: THE FUTURE HAS BEEN CHANGED!!!!
Mar 31 2008, 6:12 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 31 2008, 6:12 AM EDT
"Could this show be result of Time Travel and Parrallel Dimensions?"
Sorry to keep bursting bubbles but…..
OK parallel dimensions and branching time travel theories. The first purposes that for any moment in time there are infinite possibilities playing out in alternative dimensions paralleling our own, this is what was shown in Sliders, Stargate, StarTrek, and numerous other TV shows and film, while not about time travel per se it does bare some similarities to the branching time line time travel stories where if you went back in time this creates a change which causes the traveller to branch off into a parallel dimension similar to one you came from but taking into account the changes your being there caused. This in no way affects the original timeline you come from and that is why it can’t be the time travel used in this show. Everyone seems to be looking at the end result of time travel and not the reason for it “being” in the first place! (Insert exasperation) Why would skynet or future John even bother to send anyone back if they simply branch off into a parallel dimension when they arrive? It just doest make any sense for them to go to all that trouble when it ultimately wouldn’t benefit them!
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)