Location: Terminator: The Ultimate Reference Guide

Discussion: A weighty problemReported This is a featured thread

Showing 41 - 60 of 118  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
GregTheVirus
GregTheVirus
40. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 5:19 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 5:19 PM EST
"T888 and Cameron endos aren't made purely out of tantalum-nobium, tantalum and niobium are additives blended with titanium and aluminum in intermetallic form (the real life equivalent of a hyperalloy) to give the endos greater strength and a higher melting point.

Terminators sink rather than float because of bouyancy, not weight issues. And yes, Terminators are a bit heavier than a human of the same size, but not ridiculously so. A 600 lb. terminator would be a very poor infiltrator-- we joked in the writers' room that you could simply dig pits with breakaway flooring in front of every resistance bunker as a foolproof way to foil them.

Of course, a 'roided out bodybuilder hiding among skinny, starving refugees isn't a great infiltrator, either, but that's a whole other subject. :)"
Okay. If that's the word, that's the word. Now I can rest my mind from estimating different alloys to try and get to the "20%" figure (couldn't come up with one, but didn't consider aluminum, yeah I'm a chemistry nerd).

Thanks John Henry. :-)
Do you find this valuable?    
VersusTerminus
VersusTerminus
41. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 5:44 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 5:44 PM EST
"T888 and Cameron endos aren't made purely out of tantalum-nobium, tantalum and niobium are additives blended with titanium and aluminum in intermetallic form (the real life equivalent of a hyperalloy) to give the endos greater strength and a higher melting point.

Terminators sink rather than float because of bouyancy, not weight issues. And yes, Terminators are a bit heavier than a human of the same size, but not ridiculously so. A 600 lb. terminator would be a very poor infiltrator-- we joked in the writers' room that you could simply dig pits with breakaway flooring in front of every resistance bunker as a foolproof way to foil them.

Of course, a 'roided out bodybuilder hiding among skinny, starving refugees isn't a great infiltrator, either, but that's a whole other subject. :)"
It's so nice having an inside source for these things. Thanks for clearing that up.

Also; yes, Ahnuld wouldn't blend in well, but having an emaciated terminator as the big-bad/protector would've made the first two Terminator movies far less awesome.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
kingsteve
kingsteve
42. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 5:49 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 5:49 PM EST
"It's so nice having an inside source for these things. Thanks for clearing that up.

Also; yes, Ahnuld wouldn't blend in well, but having an emaciated terminator as the big-bad/protector would've made the first two Terminator movies far less awesome."
Apparently they were orginally going to cast Lance Henrickson as the Terminator and Arnie as Kyle Reese. Cameron's original idea was to have a slender, normal looking, but impossibly strong Terminator.

I guess what stopped them was one of Kyle's lines in the script about his hobbies in the future. "Starving, hiding from HKs."

Now it just wouldn't seem right with a roided up man saying the same thing. "Stah-ving. Hai-ding from Aitch-Kays." He wouldn't have seemed that hungry, lol.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
IvyMike
IvyMike
43. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 5:49 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 5:49 PM EST
"T888 and Cameron endos aren't made purely out of tantalum-nobium, tantalum and niobium are additives blended with titanium and aluminum in intermetallic form (the real life equivalent of a hyperalloy) to give the endos greater strength and a higher melting point. <snip>"
Yes, and I thought the show made that pretty clear - Cameron said Carter's Crate of Coltan was sufficient for 530 endoskeletons - that's a lot of endoskeletons!
The coltan bars were pretty heavy, but each endo must constitute less than one bar.

Skynet is stockpiling coltan because it is a small but rare and essential component of the endoskeletons. Other metals will still be readily available after JD.

I also inferred that "hyperalloy" referred to some extremely advanced form of material such as does not yet exist; like say metal combined with carbon nanotubes to form a light but very tough, strong and heat-resistant material. Skynet uses very advanced technology (and presumably develops it itself) as evidenced by the "liquid metal" machines.

The road-side worker guy easily picked up Cromartie's head with one hand, suggesting it actually weighs less than a human's head of around 4.5 - 5 kg (10-11 lbs).
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
VersusTerminus
VersusTerminus
44. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:15 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:15 PM EST
"Apparently they were orginally going to cast Lance Henrickson as the Terminator and Arnie as Kyle Reese. Cameron's original idea was to have a slender, normal looking, but impossibly strong Terminator.

I guess what stopped them was one of Kyle's lines in the script about his hobbies in the future. "Starving, hiding from HKs."

Now it just wouldn't seem right with a roided up man saying the same thing. "Stah-ving. Hai-ding from Aitch-Kays." He wouldn't have seemed that hungry, lol."
lol. Just imagining Arnold saying some of Kyle's lines is funny as hell. LH probably would've made a good termi though, oh well.
Do you find this valuable?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
45. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:17 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:17 PM EST
"Weight makes no difference with swimming; Terminators have no buoyancy - because they don't have lungs and have no oxygen inside them to help keep them afloat. Ships weigh far more than a Termie, but they float fine. "
This is very wrong.
Terminators don't float because their specific weight is higher than water, aka over 1 kg/dm3.

It's called Archemedes' principle,and the oxygen in the lungs doesn't have anythign to deal with this: corpses float too.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
46. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:21 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:36 PM EST
"
Terminators sink rather than float because of bouyancy, not weight issues. And yes, Terminators are a bit heavier than a human of the same size, but not ridiculously so. A 600 lb. terminator would be a very poor infiltrator-- we joked in the writers' room that you could simply dig pits with breakaway flooring in front of every resistance bunker as a foolproof way to foil them.
"
Turk, with all the due respect, this is scientifically VERY wrong.

I'm a mechanical engineer and I know what I'm saying. Mr.Archemedes 2400 years ago proved that a body float if its weight is less than the weight of the water it moves.

You can make jokes, but 600 lb are based on the specific weight of Ti alloys (oh, my PhD was on Ti10-2-3 and Ti 6-4 alloys)...this is terminator, how it was shown in the first movie, if you're neglecting it, sorry, as a researcher and engineer I wouldn't believe that you're writing good sci-fi, but as a matter of fact I always thought that the easiest way to detect terminators outside bunkers would have been to place a scale at the entrance.

Still, Terminator is a movie from 1984 and they didn't take in consideration, we have to accept that and leave with that, though, without forgetting that physics of metals is not a opinion.
Do you find this valuable?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
47. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:34 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:34 PM EST
"Yes, and I thought the show made that pretty clear - Cameron said Carter's Crate of Coltan was sufficient for 530 endoskeletons - that's a lot of endoskeletons!
The coltan bars were pretty heavy, but each endo must constitute less than one bar.
"
If they are addictive in the melted metal their value should be less 1%...for instance in steel you can vanadium in order to improve its elasticity, typical case for springs...their value could variate between 0.30 to 1 % max, therefore if the bar is made of pure coltan, it should be enough to make more than 530 endoskeletons.

If I wanted to make a tough question for the Turk I would ask why Skynet felt necessary to use coltan, since a Ti-10-2-3 alloy used in the nozzles of jets doesn't lose its mechanical propetries until 1500°C...is Skynet operating Terminators in vulcanoes? :D
Do you find this valuable?    
IvyMike
IvyMike
48. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:36 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:36 PM EST
"Turk, with all the due respect, this is scientifically VERY wrong.

I'm a mechanical engineer and I know what I'm saying. Mr.Archemedes 2400 years ago proved that a body float if its weight is less than the weight of the water it moves.

You can make jokes, but 600 lb are based on the specific weight of Ti alloys (oh, my PhD was on Ti10-2-3 and Ti 6-4 alloys)...this is terminator, how it was shown in the first movie, if you're neglecting it, sorry, as a researcher and engineer I wouldn't believe that you're writing good sci-fi."
Are you just being argumentative for the sake of it?

Buoyancy =/= weight, which is what TheTurk is saying.
Do you find this valuable?    
IvyMike
IvyMike
49. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:40 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:40 PM EST
"If they are addictive in the melted metal their value should be less 1%...for instance in steel you can vanadium in order to improve its elasticity, typical case for springs...their value could variate between 0.30 to 1 % max, therefore if the bar is made of pure coltan, it should be enough to make more than 530 endoskeletons.

If I wanted to make a tough question for the Turk I would ask why Skynet felt necessary to use coltan, since a Ti-10-2-3 alloy used in the nozzles of jets doesn't lose its mechanical propetries until 1500°C...is Skynet operating Terminators in vulcanoes? :D"
Because in the future the Resistance uses plasma rifles, hence the need for heat resistance.

"Hyperalloy" suggests to me something more advanced than simply different metals melted together. If Skynet can produce "mimetic poly-alloy", what other fictional materials can it produce?
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
50. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:42 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:42 PM EST
"Are you just being argumentative for the sake of it?

Buoyancy =/= weight, which is what TheTurk is saying."
I'm talking about science.

And the problem is not weight, it's density. Learn the difference.
Do you find this valuable?    
notty22
notty22
51. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:42 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:42 PM EST
TheTurk is correct in what he is stating without getting to the exact parallels to Archemedes' principle. And without bringing in shape and design of the terminator and where its metacenter is at. All things needed to consider the principle of displacing water to achieve buoyancy.
Its like why a coin goes to the bottom, why a roll of coins goes to the bottom, but stamp out that roll of coins to form a crude v hull and it will float even holding more rolls of coins.
Do you find this valuable?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
52. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:46 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:46 PM EST
"Because in the future the Resistance uses plasma rifles, hence the need for heat resistance.

"Hyperalloy" suggests to me something more advanced than simply different metals melted together. If Skynet can produce "mimetic poly-alloy", what other fictional materials can it produce?"
OK a tungsten or depleted uranium round was able to open the skull of a T-888 at close range, therefore we have to assume that they're more efficient than plasma rifles and that plasma rifles are opearting over the temperatures of 1500°C and they're working as HEAT but they penetrate melting the armour, a process that would ask for some seconds, if not minutes, since the Titanium is a bad heat conductor.

I'd say that it's a little stretch. Just a little. :D
Do you find this valuable?    
GregTheVirus
GregTheVirus
53. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:52 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:54 PM EST
"TheTurk is correct in what he is stating without getting to the exact parallels to Archemedes' principle. And without bringing in shape and design of the terminator and where its metacenter is at. All things needed to consider the principle of displacing water to achieve buoyancy.
Its like why a coin goes to the bottom, why a roll of coins goes to the bottom, but stamp out that roll of coins to form a crude v hull and it will float even holding more rolls of coins."
Let's be careful about Archemedes' principle. "Weight" is a very loosely term, and is effectively worthless in the physics world. MASS still matters in archemede's principle, because the premise behind buoyancy is water displacement. Thus, mass is important, because density is important.

Shape and design wouldn't matter as much (regarding a terminator), the only thing that would matter is a design like a ship (which the empty space allows for it's buoyancy). The space displaces some of the water, thereby bringing the mass of the ship displacing the water to a value less than the water displaced, thereby allowing it to float.

Both parties, the Turk and Cuthbert's argument are both correct. The only issue is talking in different contexts. My point - let's not get misconstrued, mass and shape matter (not weight).
Do you find this valuable?    
IvyMike
IvyMike
54. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:53 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:53 PM EST
"I'm talking about science.

And the problem is not weight, it's density. Learn the difference."
Oh FFS...

TheTurk: "Terminators sink rather than float because of bouyancy, not weight issues."
He is saying that the Terminators are not ridiculously heavy, like say 600lbs, they are only slightly heavier than humans. Since humans can float because we have an average density of around the same as water, if a Terminator is even a little heavier than a human of the same size (volume) then it will sink.

Comprende?
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
IvyMike
IvyMike
55. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:54 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:54 PM EST
"OK a tungsten or depleted uranium round was able to open the skull of a T-888 at close range, therefore we have to assume that they're more efficient than plasma rifles and that plasma rifles are opearting over the temperatures of 1500°C and they're working as HEAT but they penetrate melting the armour, a process that would ask for some seconds, if not minutes, since the Titanium is a bad heat conductor.

I'd say that it's a little stretch. Just a little. :D"
...which is why Skynet uses coltan... sheesh...
Do you find this valuable?    

DavidB1111
56. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:55 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:57 PM EST
"OK a tungsten or depleted uranium round was able to open the skull of a T-888 at close range, therefore we have to assume that they're more efficient than plasma rifles and that plasma rifles are opearting over the temperatures of 1500°C and they're working as HEAT but they penetrate melting the armour, a process that would ask for some seconds, if not minutes, since the Titanium is a bad heat conductor.

I'd say that it's a little stretch. Just a little. :D"
Well, I don't know much about the science behind it all, but hey, I'm fat, and I can't reliably float. As for Titanium being a bad heat conductor, it's melting point is about 3500 degrees F. I can't spell the F word there. :)
I always though using a wall of titanium would be good to stop lava from escaping. Well, better that Cement blocks. :) So, doesn't having a high melting point do anything for it?
Also, to be honest a plasma rifle like the ones on Terminator don't even make sense. Plasma is the forth state of matter, and it eerily shares some properties with the other three states.
One thing also, Plasma would be multitudes of times hotter than Thermite. There's no metal on the planet that can resist a piece of the sun's surface hitting it, and let's face it, that's what plasma is, the surface of the sun. All 400 trillion trillion square miles of it.

Hey, now, everyone, let's relax. Yes, Cuthburt, you kind of fell for the old whoops, they mean something else not this trick. :)
And for Coltan, even if it's melting point and it's head conductivity is better than Titanium, it still shouldn't be able to shrug off real plasma.
Do you find this valuable?    
sad_panda
sad_panda
57. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 6:57 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 6:57 PM EST
"Weight makes no difference with swimming; Terminators have no buoyancy - because they don't have lungs and have no oxygen inside them to help keep them afloat. Ships weigh far more than a Termie, but they float fine. "
Weight makes all the difference. If your body weighs more than the water it displaces, you sink. If you fill your lungs with air, then you are increasing your displacement so that you can float. Humans are mostly water anyway, so air-filled lungs are enough to make the difference. For Terminators, they weigh too much to float.

My view on this is that Arnold was a less advanced model and most likely considerably heavier. In T3 when the guy said he weighed a ton, he didn't actually mean Arnold weighs exactly 2000 pounds. He meant that Arnold, a big guy to start, weighs more than he expects.

Cameron is a better more technologically advanced infiltrator so she is most likely made of lighter materials and appears more human. However, because she can not swim, she still weighs more than the girl, Allison, that she is replacing.
Do you find this valuable?    

DavidB1111
58. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 7:01 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 7:01 PM EST
So, if that's true, how do boats float in the water? :) Because they weight a lot more than the water they're on. Unless you take the mass of the entire ocean into account, :)
I can't believe it's as simple as buoyancy and weight, but hey.
Again, there's a small flaw with this theory too, I weight 285 pounds, no, not British, :), and I pretty much don't float well. I don't weigh more than a terminator though. Or for that matter, a boat.
Do you find this valuable?    
CuthbertAllgood
CuthbertAllgood
59. RE: A weighty problem
Feb 18 2009, 7:03 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 18 2009, 7:03 PM EST
"Oh FFS...

TheTurk: "Terminators sink rather than float because of bouyancy, not weight issues."
He is saying that the Terminators are not ridiculously heavy, like say 600lbs, they are only slightly heavier than humans. Since humans can float because we have an average density of around the same as water, if a Terminator is even a little heavier than a human of the same size (volume) then it will sink.

Comprende?"
Mmm, I think you don't get it.

A body floats if its average density is below 1 kg/dm3. That's all, folks.

Now, the density of flessh is much lower than 1 kg/dm3, I should ask Mhall that the last time gave me the precise number, but let's say that it's 0.7 kg/dm3, -30% than water. This means that a body just made of water would have 30% of mass more, and we already are over the values that the writers indicate as "realistic" for them.

But here we aren't talking about water, we are talking about a ti-based alloy. Do you want to know the density of Titanium?

4.506 g·cm−3 while for water is 0.998 g/cm³ (liquid at 20 °C, 1 atm)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium

And with this, the game is over,even considering that half of the terminator is metal and half flesh we would have an average density "floating" around 3 gr/cm3, this would mean that a terminator is effectively of a weight of 600 lb...even this extimation is pretty...optimistic.

And that's all, good night and good luck!
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last