Location: Episode 9 - Complications

Discussion: "Complications" Official Discussion threadReported This is a featured thread

Showing 601 - 607 of 607  |  Show  posts at a time
First < Previous | 31
TerminTatorTot
TerminTatorTot
600. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 21 2008, 11:49 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:49 PM EST
We struggle to understand some things in TSCC. I can only imagine how those poor saps in recent years on "Lost" TV series discussion forums must have gone insane. I saw a couple of those episodes and was lost. The writers were smoking something funny. Do you find this valuable?    
Prez270
Prez270
601. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 21 2008, 11:52 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 21 2008, 11:52 PM EST
"We struggle to understand some things in TSCC. I can only imagine how those poor saps in recent years on "Lost" TV series discussion forums must have gone insane. I saw a couple of those episodes and was lost. The writers were smoking something funny."
'Lost' was the most ridiculously convoluted TV series I ever tried to watch. Every episodes there were a dozen more mysteries revealed with never any resolution to any of the previous 6000 mystery plot lines. After about 8 or 9 episodes of the first season, I gave up.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
TerminTatorTot
TerminTatorTot
602. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 22 2008, 12:20 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 22 2008, 12:20 AM EST
"'Lost' was the most ridiculously convoluted TV series I ever tried to watch. Every episodes there were a dozen more mysteries revealed with never any resolution to any of the previous 6000 mystery plot lines. After about 8 or 9 episodes of the first season, I gave up.
"
Agreed. I burned out very quickly on "Lost". It is a standing joke among everybody I know. I've actually heard stand-up comics rip at it. Lets hope the TSCC writers don't go overboard like that.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Will217
Will217
603. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 22 2008, 3:22 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 22 2008, 3:22 PM EST
I was watching "Complications" again and something hit me:

We know now that Fischer was lying to Derek and Stephanie about what he was doing in the past once he admitted that he was in fact Charles Fischer but I think I've reasoned a way why Derek should've known he was lying about being sent back as a "reward" for his services to SkyNet.

Put yourselves in Derek and Jessie's shoes for a minute so disregard the scene where he sneaks into his old job and frames his younger self because D & J aren't privy to that info. If SkyNet did send him back as a reward, wouldn't it make sense that they send him back far enough that he would be long gone before Judgment Day? Otherwise it's not much of a reward then is it? He may be caught in the blast and perish when JD comes along this time around. Figure he's in his late 40s early 50s or so, wouldn't it make sense to send him back at least 50 years before JD so he could enjoy his so-called reward?

I don't know. I think Derek should've picked up on that. Maybe he'd've been more adamant that they not kill him until they'd gotten as much info on SkyNet as possible. Even Jessie made the point that "no one comes back without a mission."
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Will217
Will217
604. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 22 2008, 3:24 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 22 2008, 3:24 PM EST
"I was watching "Complications" again and something hit me:

We know now that Fischer was lying to Derek and Stephanie about what he was doing in the past once he admitted that he was in fact Charles Fischer but I think I've reasoned a way why Derek should've known he was lying about being sent back as a "reward" for his services to SkyNet.

Put yourselves in Derek and Jessie's shoes for a minute so disregard the scene where he sneaks into his old job and frames his younger self because D & J aren't privy to that info. If SkyNet did send him back as a reward, wouldn't it make sense that they send him back far enough that he would be long gone before Judgment Day? Otherwise it's not much of a reward then is it? He may be caught in the blast and perish when JD comes along this time around. Figure he's in his late 40s early 50s or so, wouldn't it make sense to send him back at least 50 years before JD so he could enjoy his so-called reward?

I don't know. I think Derek should've picked up on that. Maybe he'd've been more adamant that they not kill him until they'd gotten as much info on SkyNet as possible. Even Jessie made the point that "no one comes back without a mission.""
Wow...did I just refer to Jessie and "Stephanie?" LOL! I've heard of actors doing that when reciting lines but I think that was a first.

My bad people.
Do you find this valuable?    
notty22
notty22
605. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Nov 22 2008, 3:42 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 22 2008, 3:42 PM EST
"Wow...did I just refer to Jessie and "Stephanie?" LOL! I've heard of actors doing that when reciting lines but I think that was a first.

My bad people."
I was just watching the episode again, when Cam is putting the whoop down on Ellison, what is up with the see through tops! On a serious note, she had that look of satisfaction when John commented that "thats one for you", similar reaction to when Sarah said The Bible was her kind of book.
. / one of the first times she requested emotional help from John asking about empathy hours after the original incident. I wish they would just have them explore each other more on screen. There is no reason why he cannot openly talk to her, even if he is having trouble communicating with "parent figures".
Do you find this valuable?    
T900-JE
T900-JE
606. RE: "Complications" Official Discussion thread
Dec 23 2008, 11:42 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 23 2008, 11:42 PM EST
"I was watching "Complications" again and something hit me:

We know now that Fischer was lying to Derek and Stephanie about what he was doing in the past once he admitted that he was in fact Charles Fischer but I think I've reasoned a way why Derek should've known he was lying about being sent back as a "reward" for his services to SkyNet.

Put yourselves in Derek and Jessie's shoes for a minute so disregard the scene where he sneaks into his old job and frames his younger self because D & J aren't privy to that info. If SkyNet did send him back as a reward, wouldn't it make sense that they send him back far enough that he would be long gone before Judgment Day? Otherwise it's not much of a reward then is it? He may be caught in the blast and perish when JD comes along this time around. Figure he's in his late 40s early 50s or so, wouldn't it make sense to send him back at least 50 years before JD so he could enjoy his so-called reward?

I don't know. I think Derek should've picked up on that. Maybe he'd've been more adamant that they not kill him until they'd gotten as much info on SkyNet as possible. Even Jessie made the point that "no one comes back without a mission.""
I had to watch again just to understand what the F$%K is going on.
"Complications"-they lived up to it's name.
Do you find this valuable?    
First < Previous | 31

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)