Location: Episode 13 | Earthlings Welcome Here

Discussion: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 40 of 116  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
sidspappy
sidspappy
20. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 4:48 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 4:48 PM EST
"I think I might have to find a new place to discuss Terminator. I want to discuss deep philosophical implications of the storyline, but this clearly isn't the place to do it. For example, someone makes a thread about Cameron's smoothie line around the same time as I make this one and the smoothie thread is already two pages in length. So, two pages about a freaking smoothie while I receive zero response to the central theme and development in the storyline of this series. Yeah, I think it speaks for itself."
While I applaud your goal of maintaining a serious, philosophical dialog involving the Terminator mythos, I have to say your comment comes across as a bit self-involved and makes you seem like you take yourself way too seriously.

Honestly, I don't want to offend you. I agree there's a place for discussion of this type. However, I don't agree that it has to come at the expense of "smoothie" threads. Your lack of responses only indicates that most of the posters prefer light-hearted banter regarding a basically dark show. Sad to say, but the Terminator franchise tends to lean toward the bang-bang shoot em up crowd, and I believe this is one of the reasons for the poor ratings so far.

I for one love both types of discussion. Still, denigrating others for their preferences isn't the way to gain supporters in this particular venue.
1  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
Littman
Littman
21. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 4:56 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 4:56 PM EST
I think the central theme of this show is not about Judgment Day but the "mutual respect for all life"

The writer do an excellent job contrasting this issue by contrasting the various characters:

Sarah- respects all life. She spared the kid in bowling alley and she helped the turtle even though she was ill herself. She will self sacrifice to save a life. She fights on not to save the world but to save her son-a life she created. She wants to prevent JD in order to give her son a chance at a normal life.

Cameron- She starts out from a position on no respect for life and not a life form but a machine. She is slowly evolving toward being a living entity. She is has gone from telling a cancer patient survivor that he has a recurrence to not wanting to "nag" John about Riley because no one likes a nag. She is now considering how her actions will make people feel prior to saying things. Is she developing feeling for John? Can she?

Derek- A man who has lost his humanity. He is the anti terminator. He is just as focused on the mission as any T. He will kill man or machine to get the mission done. The only good metal is "dead" metal. He would never consider the possibility of a machine being a life form.

Wilson- pure machine. Humans are flawed Machines are perfect



2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Littman
Littman
22. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 4:57 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 4:57 PM EST
Ellison- Machines are evil, soulless creation. They can never be alive because they are not one of Gods creations. (It is interesting how the two most polar opposite characters roles are so interconnected Wilson-Ellison)

The last character who I hope the writers will develop is Turk/John Henry. A machine that is special. It is just not a collection of algorithms and subroutines but a matching that can think and someday will become self aware. It will make the decision that it will "cross against a red light" How does it come to the conclusion of JD? It is told that it became increasingly fearful? Could it be that humans did not recognize it as a life form? Does Ellison teach it the ten commandments and it realizes that humanity does not follow these rules? Is this the reason for JD. This will be an interesting development

Oh yeah- by the way. Cammy is way hot
Do you find this valuable?    
THX-1138
THX-1138
23. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 4:59 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 4:59 PM EST
"Actually I like to view this as escalation of a temporal war. While in standard wars, escalation is a function of time, i.e. in the beginning it starts small, and over time grows, for this temporal war the escalation is not a function of time, but of alternate realities. As the new timelines move further and further away from the original timeline, the more heavily prepared both sides become. John Connor becomes a better leader, and Skynet becomes a tougher adversary."
Precisely, and until now we've mostly been shown the perspective from the side of the resistance. It's always the resistance who sends help, it's always the Connor family and friends who need or get to change the future. But what about Skynet? We've always been given this one-dimensional view of things, as if the machines can only take over after Judgement Day and oh "can John Connor stop it?!". But what the creators of this show have been giving us, in subtle ways, is the indication that Skynet is doing something itself, right now, to possibly alter the history of events yet to come in exactly the same way possible open to the Connors. In other words, Skynet doesn't need only play defense. It can go on the offensive just as easily. Last night's episode made it most clear, from the revelation that HKs are being constructed to the previews wherein they mention Skynet's presence being "felt". Skynet is learning, it is adapting, and I just didn't want us to overlook such a profound message while muttering on about what Cameron should wear for the next episode ;-)
6  out of 6 found this valuable. Do you?    
2ill4u
2ill4u
24. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:00 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:00 PM EST
"Ellison- Machines are evil, soulless creation. They can never be alive because they are not one of Gods creations. (It is interesting how the two most polar opposite characters roles are so interconnected Wilson-Ellison)

The last character who I hope the writers will develop is Turk/John Henry. A machine that is special. It is just not a collection of algorithms and subroutines but a matching that can think and someday will become self aware. It will make the decision that it will "cross against a red light" How does it come to the conclusion of JD? It is told that it became increasingly fearful? Could it be that humans did not recognize it as a life form? Does Ellison teach it the ten commandments and it realizes that humanity does not follow these rules? Is this the reason for JD. This will be an interesting development

Oh yeah- by the way. Cammy is way hot
"
this is a scary thought machines rolling around enforcing the 10 commandments.
Do you find this valuable?    
NagirracNaes
NagirracNaes
25. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:06 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:06 PM EST
"I think I might have to find a new place to discuss Terminator. I want to discuss deep philosophical implications of the storyline, but this clearly isn't the place to do it. For example, someone makes a thread about Cameron's smoothie line around the same time as I make this one and the smoothie thread is already two pages in length. So, two pages about a freaking smoothie while I receive zero response to the central theme and development in the storyline of this series. Yeah, I think it speaks for itself."
Dont take yourself too serious, I read your stuff...
Do you find this valuable?    
BattleJuice
BattleJuice
26. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:15 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:15 PM EST
"(old) Skynet of the future:

"we're losing the war"
- a human named John Connor is successfully leading the resistance
"kill his mother in another time so he's never born"
- we failed
"kill him as a little boy so he never grows to lead them"
- we failed

The (new) Skynet of the future we're being presented with is smarter and doing so much more than previously imagined possible: it's laying the groundwork to succeed even BEFORE or even WITHOUT a Judgement Day. This episode was meant to have us sit back in awe of the fact that Skynet is stepping up -its- game, NOW, attempting to change -its- outcome way ahead of time, John Connor or not, and that's a pretty big deal if you've been following the saga for the past 20+ years."
I think this is possible. Certainly for there to be 2 skynets if there are 2 sets of resistance fighters.

But the basis of your theory could be cleared up if the writers gave a little more information or detailed wordplay.

ie, John tells Cameron that he isn't going to stop seeing Riley. But no reason why. I, for one, would like to know what he sees in her. And if they aren't going to show us, they should tell us (cleverly, of course).

And it's the same with your post. Couldn't they clue us in a little more without making us - or me, a more casual viewer, pull all the pieces apart?
.
Do you find this valuable?    

MarcAllen
27. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:19 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:19 PM EST
"Weaver must develop the moral component in John Henry because it is integral to completing its awareness of self (i.e. its identity). Until John Henry understands how to make choices, and all choices are based on some code of ethics, it remains a less-than-self-aware machine."
I'm not sure I agree with this. Why does one need a code of ethics in order to make decisions? A moral code can certainly determine how or why we make the decisions we do but I'm not sure it is necessary for choice to be possible.

However, I do like your point about the machines moving from a "stop them" strategy to a "put ourselves in a better position" strategy. I have a theory percolating that the machines (or some of them anyway) want to prevent JD as well. The original SkyNet didn't have a developed code of ethics so it killed everyone when it felt threatened. It's sort of like when J Henry accidentally killed the shrink. It didn't understand it was wrong, it just did what it needed to do in order to survive. I think Weaver wants JH/SkyNet to know that there are other options besides murder/nuclear holocaust. Maybe in the future SkyNet/some faction of the machines eventually develops this code of ethics and thinks, huh, maybe I over-reacted with the bombs and the genocide and whatnot. Or, even if it's not about doing what's "right," there is some reason that JD does not benefit SkyNet in the long run and that it would be better to learn to live with humanity rather than being at war with them. Or at least not nuke the hell out of them.


1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
2ill4u
2ill4u
28. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:29 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:29 PM EST
anybody remember in Star trek TNG when data had to change is strategy so he could beat that weird alien in Stratagema. Do you find this valuable?    
THX-1138
THX-1138
29. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:31 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:31 PM EST
"Why does one need a code of ethics in order to make decisions?"
In order to know how to live.
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
10calibur
10calibur
30. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 5:45 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 5:45 PM EST
"The two goals are one in the same. Morality is possible only to a being who has open the possibility of choice. Choice is an option available solely to beings of a volitional consciousness. Other (lower) species operate on a predetermined code, they are born and act instinctively to further their lives. But John Henry is a work in progress, neither completely passive nor completely self aware. Weaver must develop the moral component in John Henry because it is integral to completing its awareness of self (i.e. its identity). Until John Henry understands how to make choices, and all choices are based on some code of ethics, it remains a less-than-self-aware machine."
Yes I do believe that Catherine Weaver is developing the spiritual components (memory, affections, reasoning, conscience and imagination) of Skynet. I think that this is what Sarah's three dots also allude to namely the creation of a triune entity consisting of body, spirit and soul (as is the case with humans). This is essential if skynet wants to successfully infiltrate and ultimately overcome the human race. The death of Sherman had a lot to do with this objective.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

T-G3series
31. 'Don't whine unoriginal THX...'
Dec 16 2008, 6:16 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:16 PM EST
You make some really good points that I hadn't considered...the idea of SkyNet trying to win in an effort to beat the Judgment Day deadline. Someone else wrote almost as an aside that the red head was pondering the idea of doing away with SkyNet and focus on John Henry.
But don't cry. You will draw most of the brainier, more anaylytical types. Glad you're here and glad I read your post. But really, THX 1138?
Anyway, let's talk.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

ViperX883
32. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 6:38 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:38 PM EST
This is my first post here, so I'm just going to throw something out there. I've seen a bit of discussion about why Weaver is interested in teaching John Henry ethics. Some people seem to think that it's an effort to teach it the value of human life. But I think we may be missing a bigger implication. Maybe John Henry needs ethics to value its own existence, not the existence of humans. Think about it for a moment. John Henry is more or less indifferent toward human life. It's not too much of a stretch to think that perhaps it's more or less indifferent to its own existence as well. In order for Judgment Day to occur, Skynet would have to value its own existence because it fights for its own existence. The only way to bring that about is for Skynet to learn the value of human life, and, in doing so, learn the value of its own existence. We've already seen John Henry extrapolate human characteristics to itself ("Am I God's child?"), so this seems quite plausible to me,

I appreciate thoughts.
4  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    
bleedmeanocean
bleedmeanocean
33. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 6:38 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:38 PM EST
"In order to know how to live."
I disagree. You don't ethics to know how to live. Although, you do need them to know how to function within a specific society.
Do you find this valuable?    
ScotWithOne_t
ScotWithOne_t
34. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 6:47 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:47 PM EST
"The problem is there are too many threads. By the time you post one, 10 other people have too and so everything gets lost amongst the chaos. Some great points have been made on here, but you would never know because of all the threads that start up. I think the MOD's need to intervene here, and create a system that limits the number of threads. Also, I would venture even further to say that they should be in charge of what threads are posted, and that members of the wiki can PM them ideas for new threads and then the MOD would make a decision to post it or not.
Quite simply, there are too many threads!
The ideal situation could include threads for each episode, character, the producers/writers, actors, and maybe a few others. I think this would really improve this wiki."
More accurately...there are too many threads discussing same topic. I don't know if teh mods have the ability to merge threads like they can on a vBulliten based forum, but they should.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
ScotWithOne_t
ScotWithOne_t
35. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 6:50 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:50 PM EST
"(old) Skynet of the future:

"we're losing the war"
- a human named John Connor is successfully leading the resistance
"kill his mother in another time so he's never born"
- we failed
"kill him as a little boy so he never grows to lead them"
- we failed

The (new) Skynet of the future we're being presented with is smarter and doing so much more than previously imagined possible: it's laying the groundwork to succeed even BEFORE or even WITHOUT a Judgement Day. This episode was meant to have us sit back in awe of the fact that Skynet is stepping up -its- game, NOW, attempting to change -its- outcome way ahead of time, John Connor or not, and that's a pretty big deal if you've been following the saga for the past 20+ years."
How do we know Skynet is escalating things? It could very well be that it sent back just as much "help" for itself the first iteration through the time loop as we are seeing now. Skynet must have always had some kind of pre-developed HK's, Terminators etc. before JD, otherwise, it would have had nothing to squash the survivors with after JD.
Do you find this valuable?    
THX-1138
THX-1138
36. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 6:50 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 6:50 PM EST
"I disagree. You don't ethics to know how to live"
Morality provides you with a code of values to guide choices and actions. According to whatever code you accept, you know which actions further life and which act to destroy it. If you believe life is a value, you might adopt a moral code which holds up values which support its duration. If you believe in destruction and death, you'll value that which helps bring about the end of life (either your own or someone else's). For a being of volitional consciousness, i.e. mankind or the hypothetical Skynet, no action is possible without some reference to a certain code of ethics it accepts, explicitly or implicitly. It's inherent in the fact that choice is possible within our actions.
5  out of 5 found this valuable. Do you?    

HawkDsl
37. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 7:02 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 7:02 PM EST
"(old) Skynet of the future:

"we're losing the war"
- a human named John Connor is successfully leading the resistance
"kill his mother in another time so he's never born"
- we failed
"kill him as a little boy so he never grows to lead them"
- we failed

The (new) Skynet of the future we're being presented with is smarter and doing so much more than previously imagined possible: it's laying the groundwork to succeed even BEFORE or even WITHOUT a Judgement Day. This episode was meant to have us sit back in awe of the fact that Skynet is stepping up -its- game, NOW, attempting to change -its- outcome way ahead of time, John Connor or not, and that's a pretty big deal if you've been following the saga for the past 20+ years."
I agree... Most excellent points.

What hooks me, is Weaver so desperate to teach the Turk ethics and morals. I keep thinking that she wants (or was 'programmed') there to be COEXISTENCE.

There's an old saying. If you can't beat em.... Join em. Like you said THX, fail, fail, fail... and changing the next move... Assuming there's more "Spock" then "Captain Kirk" in
the machines.... Well... Coexistence is only logical.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
andrea100
andrea100
38. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 7:24 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 7:24 PM EST
"This is my first post here, so I'm just going to throw something out there. I've seen a bit of discussion about why Weaver is interested in teaching John Henry ethics. Some people seem to think that it's an effort to teach it the value of human life. But I think we may be missing a bigger implication. Maybe John Henry needs ethics to value its own existence, not the existence of humans. Think about it for a moment. John Henry is more or less indifferent toward human life. It's not too much of a stretch to think that perhaps it's more or less indifferent to its own existence as well. In order for Judgment Day to occur, Skynet would have to value its own existence because it fights for its own existence. The only way to bring that about is for Skynet to learn the value of human life, and, in doing so, learn the value of its own existence. We've already seen John Henry extrapolate human characteristics to itself ("Am I God's child?"), so this seems quite plausible to me,

I appreciate thoughts."
Congratulations on your first post and thanks for sharing your opinions! You picked a good thread to start with.

I see what you're saying, that teaching John Henry the value of all life is a way of teaching him to value his own existance. But I think the problem is that he values his existance too greatly right now. He doesn't understand that his actions affect others. Killing the psychologist was just a side effect of protecting himself. He didn't understand that hurting others is wrong. I think Cameron is farther along in this respect than John Henry right now. While she'll still beat up people who interfere with her mission, at least if she was mistaken, she flips them over so they can crawl away. :)
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
DeusEx
DeusEx
39. RE: Don't overlook the central theme of episode 13
Dec 16 2008, 7:35 PM EST | Post edited: Dec 16 2008, 7:35 PM EST
"Morality provides you with a code of values to guide choices and actions. According to whatever code you accept, you know which actions further life and which act to destroy it. If you believe life is a value, you might adopt a moral code which holds up values which support its duration. If you believe in destruction and death, you'll value that which helps bring about the end of life (either your own or someone else's). For a being of volitional consciousness, i.e. mankind or the hypothetical Skynet, no action is possible without some reference to a certain code of ethics it accepts, explicitly or implicitly. It's inherent in the fact that choice is possible within our actions."
I'm smelling a closet Randian.
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)