Sign in or 

|
jaquio |
60. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:03 PM EST
as ive stated before, i think the traitors from the future are going to cause the very thing they hoped to create (self fulfilling prophecy). by messing with john in the past (whether you consider it 'good' messing with him or 'bad') he will stop trusting people. this will cause him to either 1. trust nobody or 2. trust cam solely even tho she tried to kill him, (which wasnt her fault, but johns)the other thing you should keep in mind is by sending all these people back from the future to influence john in the past, they are depleting their ranks. if skynet wins in the future because tide is turned against the humans because they are squandering their efforts in changing the past, they will get royally owned when skynet storms the castle weve gotten a lot of signals from the show that cam and john together is bad. i dont think it has to be bad. john could learn a lot from cam about how to beat machines (and not necessarily by smashing the metal MFers into the ground). i made an analogy between chess and go. a computer can beat a human at chess, but not go. john needs to change the game hes playing if he hopes to win Do you find this valuable? |
|
HawkDsl |
61. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:06 PM EST
"Hawk and others, this is a thread masquerading as wanting to "understand"..LOL, I kinda got that too. SPACE SHUTTLE: Chris keeps talking about following "programming" as if she has no choice in the matter. Cameron is to the Space Shuttle (the most complex space craft in history) as a toaster (or whatever simplistic machine you chose, like a car) is to a paper airplane. I think Chris is thinking Cameron is a kind of paper airplane... selling her short in that regard. We already know that she has a neural net for a "brain"... same as us. She has unlimited abilities, and is not limited by "Programming". "Do you believe in the resurrection, the story of Jesus Christ?".... "I'm not programmed for faith".... LOL! Why that is funny is because she was *contemplating* her own "resurrection", and that is why she asked the question. MY theory is that she is a totally independent sentient 'being'... She simply hasn't understood that about herself yet. We know the sky is blue because someone told us that color is blue... It could be red, and we had it wrong the whole time. Cameron has had no parenting, like Weaver is trying to give John Henry now. Chris is saying she is like a paper airplane, and is following "programming". I say Cameron is more like the space shuttle in complexity, and is only beginning to understand that. I Hope that's better. 3 out of 3 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
HealingMindN |
62. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:11 PM EST
The problem is emo JC is standing in the way of himself. JF called JC an idiot for dating Riley, but that he has his reasons, thus Cam crawls into bed with him and calls him stupid. It's possible that future JC relied on Cam's objectivity because she's not motivated by personal beliefs like a human.I would love to see that entire process of what Veran described including how JC captured and reprogrammed Cam and exactly how Allison figures into the equation. Do you find this valuable? |
|
JMHthe3rd |
63. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:13 PM EST
"Or he figured out that the Resistance was turning on him because of Cameron, so he fulfilled their wish by getting rid of her. However, in defiance of them; he sent her to his younger self so that he could learn more from her in the past.That answers a) and b), but not c) and d). I'm still leaning towards my theory. But then you may be right. . . . 2110 words into Chapter Five of my fic. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Xynoxx |
64. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:13 PM EST
Good post, and you were not taken in by the thread.I am also fascinated by how the antis are the ones who bring up sex ad nauseam, "colouring" it with disparaging comments about Cameron.Oneis reminded of the puritanical who believe themselves "pure", but who in fact are the most warped underneath it all. Do you find this valuable? |
|
notty22 |
65. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:14 PM EST
"Or he figured out that the Resistance was turning on him because of Cameron, so he fulfilled their wish by getting rid of her. However, in defiance of them; he sent her to his younger self so that he could learn more from her in the past.I could believe this, almost rushed doing it. Thats why details about not knowing exactly where he was, and other things she doesn't know. But I believe John did send her. Do you find this valuable? |
|
ScotWithOne_t |
66. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:15 PM EST
"So your saying elderly couples that have been married for 50 years are only still married because of the sexual attraction?No. They are married still after 50 years because of the sense of companionship they bring each other even after their sex drive has long since died off.... of course there ARE some horny elderly couple out there... I plan on being hte dirtiest 80 year old man ever in 52 years. LOL. But that doesn't change the fact that the young version of our 50 year-married couple fell in love due to a physical AND emotional attraction. If all you have is an emotional attachment so someone from the beginning, it is a platonic friendship, not a romance. So therefore, the shippers who claim to want nothing to do with Jameronsex are only fooling themselves. IMO, if you want John and Cameron to have a close, sibling-like love, that does not qualify you as a "shipper". And why couldn't it be shown on screen? Obviously they can't show a close up money shot of the ole' in-out in-out, but they can show as much as they showed with Derek and Jesse. Do you find this valuable? |
|
HawkDsl |
67. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:23 PM EST
"No. They are married still after 50 years because of the sense of companionship they bring each other even after their sex drive has long since died off.... of course there ARE some horny elderly couple out there... I plan on being hte dirtiest 80 year old man ever in 52 years. LOL.We agree. On the other hand.... we got close to a money shot during the super bowl.... So you never know. Can you believe people where calling 911 over that? WTF is wrong with the country. Sex is not murder.... 911?? For Real?? Do you find this valuable? |
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
68. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:36 PM EST
"All the rest of it is a fantasy on the viewer's part: wishful thinking. True, only can moniter you own thoughts, but don't try to slip the sexbot fantasy in via the warm and fuzzies about Cameron's "potential."I've had shippers tell me this point blank - several times in other threads on this forum - all the while opologizing for the "fringe" that they say is large, but not every shipper's view. To me, that's like not having slaves, but allowing those that do to do so... Do you find this valuable? |
|
IvyMike |
69. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:43 PM EST
"I've had shippers tell me this point blank - several times in other threads on this forum - all the while opologizing for the "fringe" that they say is large, but not every shipper's view.If you're going to insist on tarring me (and all those who've posted in this thread) with the same brush I see no point in continuing this discussion. It seems to me that you started the OP not with any intention of trying to understand a different POV, but to round us all up so you can call us all sick perverts. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
70. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:46 PM EST
"Hawk and others, this is a thread masquerading as wanting to "understand"..Not really caring what you believem as I have seen you go off topicm, personally attck people with insults, and try to take the thread off topic. What I am doing is clearly stated. You don't have to say a thing about, everyone can READ for themselves and arrive at their own opinions. That they WILL do so IS expected: we all are watching the same show and see different things. As an example, a key shipper point is she "chooses" to not terminate JC and override her Skynet programming. I don't see that. I do know she said she was re-programmed, and that is a better source for me than her suddenly becoming fully autonomous. In my calculations, everything she had done can be explained strictly in terms of what her programming parameters are, and nothing else. I know you have a different view. I am not trying to change your mind. Or any other shippers. I am trying to understand what your points are, so I don't confuse them with my own. Know where we agree and disagree, so we don't keep tripping over each other and arguing about minute details. I want to really know where shippers are coming from, because I have a healthy respect for some of their ideas. I just want to try to make myself well known amongst the shipper ranks, so no one is thinking I am trying to subvert their beliefs: I am making mine know so shippers know where I stand, and can deal with me accordingly. There is not "secret mission" to try and make you look bad. Don't have to or need to do that. There are a LOT of shippers it seems, and I'd like to find a way to co-exist, if possible. This is THAT attempt. Get it? Do you find this valuable? |
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
71. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:53 PM EST
"That's why I think Cameron *wasn't* sent back by JC. Why would he send back Cameron who:No. JC sent her back bc she looks like a 16 yr old girl - which is perfectly normal if you saw them together. Uncle Bob had a purpose, but no longer fits. My 17 yr old nephew doesn't want to hang out with his 50 year old uncle at the mall- unless I'm dropping him off in my cool car or letting him drive. No one can get near JC with Cam around and that was JC in the future's plan. Or at least that's what I infer, from the intel we have so far. Too bad they can't send some data pods upstream and find out for real what the two JC's want/need from each other... Do you find this valuable? |
|
Pharazon |
72. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:54 PM EST
"It seems to me that you started the OP not with any intention of trying to understand a different POV, but to round us all up so you can call us all sick perverts."Yeah...Coach I seriously hope you can recognize that most of us aren't perverts. The idea behind Jameron, in my opinion, stems primarily from our love for Cameron's character and that we want her to grow even more. Please don't assume we want it to be all about sex--and we definitely don't want it to be some sort of human - sexbot thing, that is perverted and will NOT happen, nor do i want it to happen. I think that in this show, that's something that wouldn't HAVE to be involved for them to have a relationship. IF they pursue a romance in the show, and desire to make it more "physical," I don't think they would make it too overt. It wouldn't really fit their characters, at least not yet. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
73. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 8:55 PM EST
"as ive stated before, i think the traitors from the future are going to cause the very thing they hoped to create (self fulfilling prophecy). by messing with john in the past (whether you consider it 'good' messing with him or 'bad') he will stop trusting people. this will cause him to either 1. trust nobody or 2. trust cam solely even tho she tried to kill him, (which wasnt her fault, but johns)Very good points. Totally unexpected viewpoint. We'll see soon enough, eh? Do you find this valuable? |
|
Xynoxx |
74. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:00 PM EST
"Not really caring what you believem as I have seen you go off topicm, personally attck people with insults, and try to take the thread off topic."No one's taking this thread "off topic, except perhaps you. As for insults - again, you protest too much. Read again the posts of these people" who spent reams of posts FIRST insulting others. Get it right. You started this thread on a false premise, and when called out by myself and others, you take refuge in sophistry. Do you find this valuable? |
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
75. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:09 PM EST
"LOL, I kinda got that too.It is better, but I wish you would talk to me directly in this forum, rather than in the third person. Seems as if you feel the need to have "strength in numbers," as if more people co-signing is going to change my opinion about things. You've tried to take things to a very over-simplistic view, but yes, I do see her as strictly operating on programming, by two sources, which allows her to process the input she experiernces. Her puprose is to complete her mission (which we do not yet know what that is), agreed? I understand that shippers jump the shark on this AI thing, and see Cam as more alive than machine - or HOPE so. I've said this in other threads and stated it up front so as not to shock anyone with my own revalations. All my cards are on the table. They are MY cards, and I'm playing them here. Try deal with that without the disdain or we'll only polerize and get nothing constructive done. Nice try with the "Chris sees Cam as a simple paper airplane and shippers know it's a big sophisticated space shuttle and he doesn't know the difference" but that don't fly. Try to state your point without the sideways insults to other people's intellegence. I didn't start this thread to be immature so rise to the level of the majority of the comments you read here. The quality of the interaction speaks for itself. Focus. Oh, Cam said her brain worked differently than ours. And yes, from a CPU standpoint, when I turn on my computer and bring up the Photoshop program, it has no choice in the matter not to do so - unless it is broken. 0 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
Pharazon |
76. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:15 PM EST
"Oh, Cam said her brain worked differently than ours. And yes, from a CPU standpoint, when I turn on my computer and bring up the Photoshop program, it has no choice in the matter not to do so - unless it is broken."Chris, I think you might be simplifying it far too much. Cameron is not comparable to photoshop. Photoshop doesn't "choose" to do things when it's broken. And it is definitely arguable, both ways I admit, that Cameron is capable of making choices instead of following a specific mission. I believe she consciously decided to override the terminate command. Cameron is a machine, but she is also very different, and I would think there's enough evidence to show that by now. 2 out of 2 found this valuable. Do you? |
|
IvyMike |
77. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:18 PM EST
Yes, please focus. That means not accusing all those who support a close relationship between Cam and John as secretly harbouring sex-bot fantasies, or bringing up highly emotive subjects like slavery which is immediately going to raise hackles.
2
out of
2 found this valuable.
Do you?
|
|
ChrisCoachKKincey |
78. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:20 PM EST
"If you're going to insist on tarring me (and all those who've posted in this thread) with the same brush I see no point in continuing this discussion.What does it matter what I call you? None of our opinions about this are going to change. What is going to change is we understand exactly what we are talking about - and why - when we are talking to one another. That way, at least we won't have any suprise hurt feelings and have to resort to name calling. This is not an arguement for shippers or anti-shippers. Never intended to be. truth is both sides probably have points we'll see in future shows. We're ALL probably right! At least I letting you know where I stand, right in front of you, extending my hand to shake yours. I'm not the enemy. Nor am I trying to kiss your ring or walk hand in hand like you'd like to see Jameron do... Somebody had to take the "high road" on this matter, and, because it is very emotionally charged, there will be some feathers ruffled. Hopefully, both sides can chill out their own participants so we don't get into a shouting match! Maybe you don't see I agree with most of what the shippers are about, and support it. The sex issue is an emotional one for me. I've fought for women's right from men who viewed them as "property" or an object for pleasure or abuse. I think that is sick also: because I view women as human beings. I see my plant Ralph more "alive" than Cameron, even though she is my favorite cahacter and I hope she goes FAR beyond her programming. She may take on a life of her own but I'm not equating that as "being alive" just yet. I sitll see her AS a Terminator, doing as her commands dictates. I know you see that differently. I';ve heard from a few shippers - which was cool - and wanted to hear from more. I'm not one to go beating around the bush so this thread get the true poop right from the horse's mouth. Wouldn't want anti's putting words in your mouth! Do you find this valuable? |
|
notty22 |
79. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:24 PM EST
"This idea of her making her own conscious decision is so fundamentally polar to what I believe I have to speak up. If she could make her own decisions outside of any programming or are you saying maybe she has some leeway? Because if she was operating on her absolute own free will she would recognize that humans are different than herself. She would choose to be with someone like herself that might also be able to have its own free will. If such a thing did not exist she would copy herself. and perhaps create one. This is truly fundamental nature. One would not decide to choose outside ones own "life form" Another being like herself would intellectually be perfect for each other which wolud be much more satisfying for her. Do you find this valuable? |