Location: Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles Discussion Forum

Discussion: What do Shippers want?Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 81 - 100 of 283  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
80. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:33 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 9:33 PM EST
""Not really caring what you believem as I have seen you go off topicm, personally attck people with insults, and try to take the thread off topic."

No one's taking this thread "off topic, except perhaps you. As for insults - again, you protest too much. Read again the posts of these people" who spent reams of posts FIRST insulting others. Get it right.

You started this thread on a false premise, and when called out by myself and others, you take refuge in sophistry.



"
We will stay on topic here. Immature commentors can go elsewhere. Not my interest. You are welcome to comment. Please do. Just keep it civil is all I ask.

This is a philosophical discussion, and to attack that is to insult another's intellegence, which does not serve to expand a sharing of various thoughts, but makes all closed minded and defensive.

I keep telling you exactly where I am coming from. Get past that. What NEW information do you have, or some other shipper that can chime in.

I do not think shippers are perverted for seeking a jameron love connection. I think what it will lead to is unnatural - unnatural enough to be "perverted" (unusual) sex. I object to that for a 16 year old boy, just as I would to a choir boy being molested. JC in the future can get his rocks off the best way he knows how. For 16 year old John, some (adults) have to set some "reasonalble" limits of decency.

To do otherwise is to let anarchy reign in our society, which could quickly lead to it destroying itself (JDay from within).

All the rest about Cam's AI is conjecture and a matter of accent. None of us really know bc it hasn't been revealed yet.

All we can talk about is from where WE are personally coming from about this, which is why I started this to hear other viewpoints. I already know my own! We can interact in nearly real time, from all around the world.

Even agreeing to disagree is a major victory. Maybe someone here goes on to teach the world this lesson, and it stops wars...

If we could do that, maybe Skynet would see the need to wipe us out!
Do you find this valuable?    
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
81. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 9:46 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 9:46 PM EST
"Chris, I think you might be simplifying it far too much. Cameron is not comparable to photoshop. Photoshop doesn't "choose" to do things when it's broken.

And it is definitely arguable, both ways I admit, that Cameron is capable of making choices instead of following a specific mission. I believe she consciously decided to override the terminate command. Cameron is a machine, but she is also very different, and I would think there's enough evidence to show that by now."
I know you see that Cam chose to override her command. You've said this before (quite well, I might add - putting you at the top of my most respected shipper representatives) and one of the reasons I like you is you stick to your guns!

But you also know my viewpoint, which I have TRIED to get as simple as possible, so I COULD think my premise through. And I have. I made the computer example to explain myself as best I could.

but I know I am discussing a subject with a person whose first impluse is to "complicate things" whereas mine IS to simplify the same things.

We need to see that FIRST about ourselves that not only do we see something different looking at the same thing, but we do so bc our approach is complete different.

We expect a different outcome so what we put into it is different from the very start. I'm not putting what you are putting into the subject of Cameron, and I am only now beginning to realize that - which makes the forum thread valuable.

I hope you are getting something from this too.

Dig:

What we are doing here - not coming together on the same accord but at least being two sides willing to talk - separates "savages" from the "civilized." We never knew - in 3 movies - why Skynet computed we should be wiped out. Did it KNOW 6+ billion human beings and decide we ALL weren't worth a damn? Was that fair for it to do so? Who repped us and how did it arrive at this conclusion?

...And if we had knocked off all the b.s. and got our act together in time, would the outcome had been different? Would the computation change.

We HAVE to hope that it would. That's what this forum is about: a mini-exercise in seeking peace.

Whether or not we achieve that is up to us - even over a fictional character, the dynamics involved are the same as "real" life!
Do you find this valuable?    
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
82. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:04 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:04 PM EST
"Yes, please focus. That means not accusing all those who support a close relationship between Cam and John as secretly harbouring sex-bot fantasies, or bringing up highly emotive subjects like slavery which is immediately going to raise hackles."
IvyMike:

My people, born in this country, are the product of people brought and kept here illegally, for profit. Not even their innocent babies are released to their homeland. Lies are told that because they are born here they are "citizens" of this land, which effectively means they have no choice: they MUST do what the ruling government tells them to. This does not match what the Founding Law denotes about the subject, however, and the very declaration of freedom from their king stated that each race is endowed by unalienable rights by their own Creator. This means no "foreign" jurisdiction has lawful superiority to reduce their sovereign birthrights...

Yet, the lies are promoted to babies in a foreign land, in exile, refugees left worse off than merely having to fend for themselves, they encircled in a society that is hostile to them, under regimes that whose monarchs and institutions have been at war against them for over 500 years.

The reasons for this are the same as they ever were: to ensure these people remain within this system of unjust tyranny, so that others may reap huge profits from their toil and suffering, dooming them to a life of subjugation, from their cradles to their graves.

These are War-CRIMES committed against a bona fide Nation-State and its People. I spearhead the movement to correct these issues, and create a bloodless revolution whereby all Peoples of the world can live safe, sane decent lives with the Rights of their respective Creator, and yet still interact peacefully to build a better civilization than the world has today. If we do not, not matter what the political position, we are in danger of wiping ourselves out in several different ways.

So it's important work.

This time spend with you is a tune-up for a larger purpose: one that can and will change the world. How fast is up to everyone it touches...
Do you find this valuable?    
trigger_happy14
trigger_happy14
83. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:07 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:07 PM EST
Huh?????????? 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
JMHthe3rd
JMHthe3rd
84. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:12 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:12 PM EST
Bah. I've been through threads just like this over and over and *over* again.

The Jamerons see Cam as a sentient, self-aware being.

The Anti-Jamerons see Cam the same way they see their laptop.

As for the programming and free will issue. Well, I'm pretty sure that free will as commonly understood does not exist. Humans don't really have it either.

We can *override* our instincts, but only because external factors influence us. We are all slaves to our circumstances.

In other words, if a rock was sentient and self-aware, it would tell you it fell to the ground because it *wanted* to. It would say it *chose* to fall. When we make a choice, we really couldn't have done it any other way.

Cameron's in the same boat as we are in this.

I'm simplifying this, but only because I don't feel like typing 5000+ characters explaining what I mean.

P.S. May be done with my fic tonight. Or tomorrow.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
JMHthe3rd
JMHthe3rd
85. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:13 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:13 PM EST
"Huh??????????"
lol

When I read his message I thought the same thing.
Do you find this valuable?    
horhai
horhai
86. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:47 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:47 PM EST
ha ha ha ha ha ha

troll had parachute
passengers watch pilot jump
with middle finger up
Do you find this valuable?    
warriormind
warriormind
87. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 10:52 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 10:52 PM EST
"This idea of her making her own conscious decision is so fundamentally polar to what I believe I have to speak up. If she could make her own decisions outside of any programming or are you saying maybe she has some leeway? Because if she was operating on her absolute own free will she would recognize that humans are different than herself. She would choose to be with someone like herself that might also be able to have its own free will. If such a thing did not exist she would copy herself. and perhaps create one. This is truly fundamental nature. One would not decide to choose outside ones own "life form" Another being like herself would intellectually be perfect for each other which wolud be much more satisfying for her."
This is an interesting point. We, as humans, tend to prefer to form groups around common traits. This is why you usually see conflicts arise between nations, religions, races, and creeds. We associate with our own group and consider everybody else evil. This of course doesn't mean we are limited to these groups, there are many examples of people crossing these metaphorical borders (Cameron might choose to as well). Also this social behavior might be caused by our instincts (biological programming), which at least for our own species encourages protecting social groupings to increase the chances of survival.

Cameron works off a different set of instincts or what might be called programming (which is an inaccurate terms since neural networks are actually trained not programmed). To her protecting John Cameron is tantamount to our instinct for survival or reproduction. Thus even with free will most of choices and actions will be inevitably influenced by her basic programming.

Chris, thanks for laying out your views for everyone. I doubt anybody will be confused where you stand on the issues. One question though, if it was shown Cameron was a sentient self-aware being would you be alright with her and John having a relationship?
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    

HawkDsl
88. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 11:19 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 11:19 PM EST
"It is better, but I wish you would talk to me directly in this forum, rather than in the third person. Seems as if you feel the need to have "strength in numbers," as if more people co-signing is going to change my opinion about things.

You've tried to take things to a very over-simplistic view, but yes, I do see her as strictly operating on programming, by two sources, which allows her to process the input she experiernces. Her puprose is to complete her mission (which we do not yet know what that is), agreed?

I understand that shippers jump the shark on this AI thing, and see Cam as more alive than machine - or HOPE so. I've said this in other threads and stated it up front so as not to shock anyone with my own revalations. All my cards are on the table.

They are MY cards, and I'm playing them here. Try deal with that without the disdain or we'll only polerize and get nothing constructive done.

Nice try with the "Chris sees Cam as a simple paper airplane and shippers know it's a big sophisticated space shuttle and he doesn't know the difference" but that don't fly. Try to state your point without the sideways insults to other people's intellegence. I didn't start this thread to be immature so rise to the level of the majority of the comments you read here. The quality of the interaction speaks for itself.

Focus.

Oh, Cam said her brain worked differently than ours. And yes, from a CPU standpoint, when I turn on my computer and bring up the Photoshop program, it has no choice in the matter not to do so - unless it is broken."
I apologize for the third person response. No bad intent... Tried to kill two birds with one stone.

I think there is a mountain of evidence that Cam is not simply following one or two programs. Even though you reject the space shuttle vrs paper airplane metaphor, you follow that up with the Photoshop, and no choice one. That's the same thing. You are still degrading her 2027 technology to the level of a windows operating system. Her chip and hardware are a neural network. So is our brains and nervous system. The only difference is the materials used. Communication in both systems is still electrical. It really isn't that big of a leap to assume her abilities are equal, or even better then our own. You can't see it any other way... and hey, that's OK too. No biggie.

This subject has been covered at nausea in the Star Trek universe. Lt. Commander Data even had a trial to determine if he was property, or a sentient being protected by The United Federation of Planets life form laws. Data won that trial, and was the best example of what we are talking about here. I don't remember the episode name, but I highly recommend it.

2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
89. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 11:44 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 11:44 PM EST
"I apologize for the third person response. No bad intent... Tried to kill two birds with one stone.

I think there is a mountain of evidence that Cam is not simply following one or two programs. Even though you reject the space shuttle vrs paper airplane metaphor, you follow that up with the Photoshop, and no choice one. That's the same thing. You are still degrading her 2027 technology to the level of a windows operating system. Her chip and hardware are a neural network. So is our brains and nervous system. The only difference is the materials used. Communication in both systems is still electrical. It really isn't that big of a leap to assume her abilities are equal, or even better then our own. You can't see it any other way... and hey, that's OK too. No biggie.

This subject has been covered at nausea in the Star Trek universe. Lt. Commander Data even had a trial to determine if he was property, or a sentient being protected by The United Federation of Planets life form laws. Data won that trial, and was the best example of what we are talking about here. I don't remember the episode name, but I highly recommend it.

"
I recall that ST ep, a pretty good one.

As for programming, we have a different description of essentially the same thing. Skynet studied humans. Who knows what horrors people endured during their research?

What science knows today is our brains take in over 4 million bits of data every second. Yet we only process about 20,000 bits in order to function as we do.

Our "eyes" don't actually see things. We take in data via the eyeball light receptors, and that input registers on our retinas i eeach eye and sent separately to our visual cortex at the back of our skulls - upside down and backwards This data is then processed and over 50% of it is discarded by the visual cortex, before it tells the rest of our brain what we saw.

Science doesn't know "where" the "mind" is - only that they know it isn't in any physical part of the body or the human brain. They do know the brain only holds about 6 months worth of data.

They know the body is composed of cells, which form colonies and replace themselves on a regular basis. No cell in your body - even bones - is the same as it was 6 months ago, so essentially you are not the same person.

They know these cells are given "orders" by the propostitions we pose by imagination or habit, within our nueral net, which then has the hypothalumus cause the pituitary gland to secrete peptides that contains these instructions and distributes them to the various cellular systems in the body, which changes their specfic compositions. For the lay person, this is akin to "chemical emotions."

A very good documentary is the movie "What the Bleep do we Know." I had lunch with some Quantum Mechanics at Stanford Research Institute last month and we had a very interesting conversation about these things.
Do you find this valuable?    
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
90. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 4 2009, 11:56 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 4 2009, 11:56 PM EST
The rabbit hole goes deeper...no matter actually touches other matter. Most of what we see as solids are waves of atoms. The atoms themselves are mostly "empty" (non-visible) space, and most of the components of the atoms, and most of the components of the components. Actually, it all breaks down somewhere on the light spectrum - as one big hologram! What we consider "reality" is really the "notes" on a light/energy keyboard. But if this light spectrum were a film you could roll out from end to end, it go from San Diego to Alaska - and the visible part we see would only amount to one inch.

In USAToday there was an article this week on new discoveries that "dark matter" may make up 60% or more of what we perceive as reality, and this is what keeps our our moon, solar system and even galaxies from flying apart.

Most of the "cutting edge" science has been discovered within the past 10 to 20 years, and today scientist can't keep up with new breakthroughs happening on a daily basis in various fields.

This is all to say yes, Skynet may well have better understandings of what is really going on.

They might have set Terminators up to do much more than we give them credit for. But WE here and now can only go with what we can perceive or infer. I infer that Cameron is operating on the programming given her, and shippers want to see more happening than that.

As you said, no biggie, as this is more a philosphical choice, made by both of us, which our choice to do. I used the example of a computer because this is the only machine I have that is comparable to Cameron's function as I see it, and I was trying to describe my view - in a simplistic fashion. Didn't mean to offend.

I'm not putting Cameron down by any means, but as I said I also don't want to read more into her than what I think I see.
Do you find this valuable?    
Blackbriar724
Blackbriar724
91. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 12:10 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 12:10 AM EST
Ah "The Measure of a Man" Good episode, if just a little talky.

Basically I feel this way: I'm neither here nor there about them getting together. Either way it's a still a good TV show. If they do get together the only thing I ask is that it be done right. I honestly couldn't care less if they have sex or not. As long as whatever they do works in the context of the show I'm happy.

On Cameron herself: Cameron is to the Enigma Machine what a Space Shuttle is a Paper Airplane. Aside from Catherine Weaver she's the most sophisticated piece of technology in our time. See's definitely self aware (She knows what she is, knows what she's doing. Isn't that what it is to be self aware?) but she isn't a person in the traditional sense of the word. She does have some medium of free will but I'm not convinced that if she wanted to she could up and leave the Connor's to fend for themselves because of her mission. So I got to believe that if they were to enter into a relationship right now it would only be to facilitate her programming.
Do you find this valuable?    
warriormind
warriormind
92. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 12:23 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 12:23 AM EST
An individual neuron in our brain can fire at a maximum of 1000 times a second, though it usually fire at a much slower rate. Compared to this a standard desktop computer can do 2,000,000,000 times more calculations a second than your brain can.

This seems like a significant advantage, but still our brains can recognize objects and faces in .1 of second which is at most 100 firings of our neurons, this is exponentially faster than the fastest computer is at matching simple patterns. How is our brain so much better than a computer? Its because our brains are complex neural networks consisting of trillions of neurons, and each neuron is attached to 10 of thousands of other neurons. This allows us to do massive parallel computations insanely quickly, like pattern matching. In fact our skill at pattern matching influences a lot of how we think, especially our tendency to abstract concepts and to try to group ideas. Many psychologist believe that the consciousness, or our sense of self, is an emergent property of the way these trillions of neurons interact with each other (ie just a side effect of the way our brain works to fulfill its programming).

Its been mentioned in the show that Cameron's chip is an advance neural net processor from the year 2027. To give some perspective what 20 years difference would make in computing. In 20 years if hardware trends don't change we will have 4096 2ghz cores on a standard desktop. It is safe to assume these Skynet has made some impressive advancements in their neural net processors. If there is one thing computers are good at it is optimizing designs.

Thus, while we don't know the exact mechanism for consciousness, it doesn't seem too unreasonable to assume that given the type of massive neural network that Cameron is using, it is probable that she could develop or already has self-awareness.
3  out of 3 found this valuable. Do you?    
warriormind
warriormind
93. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 12:28 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 12:28 AM EST
Then again my job is to research AI, so I tend to be optimistic about the potential of artificial intelligence.

To reiterate my question: Chris, would you be all right with a relationship between John and Cameron, if the writers clearly showed that Cameron was a sentient self-aware being
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
ChrisCoachKKincey
ChrisCoachKKincey
94. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 12:29 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 12:29 AM EST
"Ah "The Measure of a Man" Good episode, if just a little talky.

Basically I feel this way: I'm neither here nor there about them getting together. Either way it's a still a good TV show. If they do get together the only thing I ask is that it be done right. I honestly couldn't care less if they have sex or not. As long as whatever they do works in the context of the show I'm happy.

On Cameron herself: Cameron is to the Enigma Machine what a Space Shuttle is a Paper Airplane. Aside from Catherine Weaver she's the most sophisticated piece of technology in our time. See's definitely self aware (She knows what she is, knows what she's doing. Isn't that what it is to be self aware?) but she isn't a person in the traditional sense of the word. She does have some medium of free will but I'm not convinced that if she wanted to she could up and leave the Connor's to fend for themselves because of her mission. So I got to believe that if they were to enter into a relationship right now it would only be to facilitate her programming."
I'm glad you chimed in. That's pretty much all I was trying to say.

I too think she knows who she is, and what she is doing.

I don't know if she can say "no" to what she is doing, but a lot of shipers do (she "chose" not to override her termination command).

I don't know that what she is doing is based upon self aware emotions, or as a function to facilitate the commands given to her by others.

I also don't see that she is bothered by having these orders, when she could have JC delete these sub-routines from her programming and truely be free overall. That he doesn't (or offer to) is proof enough for me (for now) that JC present views her not as a "girl" but as a machine/tool that is incredbly sophisticated. Or maybe he can sense his dependence upon her in the future and is trying to build up his resistance to her now. Or it could be infatuation. We'll see.

I do agree that whatever they do it is good quality storytelling. Thanks for contributing.
Do you find this valuable?    

athos56
95. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 4:57 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 4:57 AM EST
I am not exactly a shipper, though I am leaning that way.
Simply put, by not having more interaction between John and Cameron the show loses a much of it's charm and much of it's comic relief as well. In addition, by limiting Summer Glau's camera time you are under utilizing the show's most popular actor and character, similar to the Yankees benching A-Rod. I happen to feel that the original core of the show, Sarah, John and Cameron are no longer primary. That dynamic is lost too.
In T-2 there were essentially 4 characters Sarah, John and the two terminators. We watched a young John Tutor Uncle Bob into understanding and valuing human life and beginning to emulate humanity. Uncle Bob seemed almost proud of his accomplishments. Furlong and the Governator had a palpable on screen chemistry, arguably their best roles, that made T2 gross almost a half Billion worldwide. Summer and John continue that chemistry when John isn't going all hormonal.
So what Shippers want is more of John realizing that Cameron is his best weapon and teaching her, keeping it well honed and on target. Which he is not right now. A positive progressive relationship.
Because, because they are both unique and in the end will be all they have.

1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Xynoxx
96. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 5:02 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 5:02 AM EST
"I do not think shippers are perverted for seeking a jameron love connection. I think what it will lead to is unnatural - unnatural enough to be "perverted" (unusual) sex. I object to that for a 16 year old boy, just as I would to a choir boy being molested. JC in the future can get his rocks off the best way he knows how. For 16 year old John, some (adults) have to set some "reasonalble" limits of decency."

"Great Jesus. I don't believe this!

And what is this "my people" thing? Nobody was talking about this subject until you brought it up. I'll say again, I mentioned the slaver, because of your attitude towards Cameron, which is an echo. Now this being an open talkboard, I fail to see the relevance of your introducing the "my people" remark. This has no relevance whatsoever to what is being discussed here.

Your continuing attempts to see Cameron simply as a machine, and refusal to understand that she is somewhat more than that, puts you right there with that man in history. I made ths comment without knowing a damned thing about your background;so your bringing it up was totally unnecessary, seems a bit self-serving.

This is not an insult. This is wondering why anyone would deliberately choose to use such a tactic.
Do you find this valuable?    

Gusar
97. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 5:06 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 5:06 AM EST
"don't try to slip the sexbot fantasy in via the warm and fuzzies about Cameron's "potential.""
Now I truly believe that whatever we say, you will never budge from your view that we're all supposedly only having sexbot fantasies. Fine, be that way. But you're wrong. Very wrong.
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Schmacky
Schmacky
98. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 5:07 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 5:07 AM EST
"Bah. I've been through threads just like this over and over and *over* again.

The Jamerons see Cam as a sentient, self-aware being.

The Anti-Jamerons see Cam the same way they see their laptop."
You're full of BS.

Just because a person doesn't want John and Cameron to hook it up doesn't mean they automatically see her as a laptop.

The John/Cameron and non-John/Cameron groups aren't so black and white.
1  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    

Xynoxx
99. RE: What do Shippers want?
Feb 5 2009, 5:14 AM EST | Post edited: Feb 5 2009, 5:14 AM EST
"The John/Cameron and non-John/Cameron groups aren't so black and white"

Oops.
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)