Location: Thomas Dekker and Josh Friedman: Live Chat

Discussion: Was that awesome or what?Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 1 - 20 of 54  |  Show  posts at a time
2 3 | Next
Wild-Kat
Wild-Kat
Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:09 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:09 PM EST
Hey, what did you all think about what Josh and Thomas had to say? 2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None

MetalHunter
1. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:10 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:10 PM EST
"Hey, what did you all think about what Josh and Thomas had to say?"
Processing...
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
LuckiiBeckii
LuckiiBeckii
2. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:11 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:11 PM EST
buffering... Do you find this valuable?    

Gusar
3. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:12 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:12 PM EST
Some interesting stuff in there.

But there's also a lot of disappointed people because they didn't get their questions answered.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
GregTheVirus
GregTheVirus
4. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:12 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:12 PM EST
"Hey, what did you all think about what Josh and Thomas had to say?"
I was only able to join half way through due to obligations, so I haven't been able to read the whole thing. Cameron fiddling with her chip, her reference about John's decisions not being trusted (pertaining to Jesse), and Josh kind of supporting that...

From what I saw though, it looked great!! I think it's amazing they do chats like that. :-)
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Wild-Kat
Wild-Kat
5. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:13 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:13 PM EST
Ok, then I'll start...Josh Friedman's quick wit really impressed me. That guy is a hoot! Show material aside, he dropped some pretty funny comments. Thomas too--I thought they were amazing! 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
GregTheVirus
GregTheVirus
6. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:13 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:13 PM EST
"Some interesting stuff in there.

But there's also a lot of disappointed people because they didn't get their questions answered."
Yeah, my question didn't get screened in time too. I'm not worried though, a lot of people asked some pretty good questions. :-)
Do you find this valuable?    
VersusTerminus
VersusTerminus
7. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:14 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:14 PM EST
There were a few nice tidbits in there, but they chose some crappy questions as well. Wanting to play it safe, I suppose. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
markingswall
markingswall
8. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:15 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:15 PM EST
Friedman and Dekker did a great job. 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Wild-Kat
Wild-Kat
9. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:15 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:15 PM EST
I need to mention that the entire chat can be REPLAYED on the chat widget. It's located on this page:

http://terminatorwiki.fox.com/page/Thomas+Dekker+and+Josh+Friedman%3A+Live+Chat
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

DeadpooI
10. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:16 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:16 PM EST
"I think it's amazing they do chats like that. :-)"
Absolutely. Much credit is deserved for bothering in the first place and being nice enough to extend their stay when that damn robot held them up. ;)
Do you find this valuable?    

Gusar
11. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:17 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:17 PM EST
"Ok, then I'll start...Josh Friedman's quick wit really impressed me. That guy is a hoot! Show material aside, he dropped some pretty funny comments. Thomas too--I thought they were amazing!"
They're definitely a hoot!

"He's talking to Summer, damn robot."

"What's T4?"
Do you find this valuable?    

Jim23
12. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:18 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:18 PM EST
"Hey, what did you all think about what Josh and Thomas had to say?"
It was good. I my question answered from Thomas. Hopefully he and Summer will enjoy the stories on cameronandjohn.com.
Do you find this valuable?    
VersusTerminus
VersusTerminus
13. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:21 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:21 PM EST
"They're definitely a hoot!

"He's talking to Summer, damn robot."

"What's T4?""
Agreed, funny guys.

Doesn't look like TSCC and T4 are going to attempt to not get in each others way if Josh is to be believed. That kinda sucks, but I was expecting it.
Do you find this valuable?    
Jameron4ever
Jameron4ever
14. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:24 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:24 PM EST
"They chose some crappy questions as well. "
For real! With some of those, I was scratching my head and going, "Okay, this flaky stuff got through and mine didn't? WTF?"
Do you find this valuable?    
commanderchang
commanderchang
15. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:26 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:26 PM EST
Josh is one cool asa dude I want to have a beer with him and elect him into public office for president with thom as Vice president Do you find this valuable?    

MetalHunter
16. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:28 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:28 PM EST
BTW. An question (without response, by me):

"What is more important (in the show): Jesse/Riley's operation or the actions of Catherine (posible future Skynet, etc...)? "
Do you find this valuable?    
Schmacky
Schmacky
17. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:29 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:29 PM EST
The chat was great, it's awesome that they're willing to do so. There were some good questions, there were some not so good questions. Only disappointing thing was quite a few people who got to ask multiple questions while some didn't get any in there.

I love Josh, he's a funny guy. Thomas is, without saying, of course a great dude and very funny himself. There were some interesting tidbits in there and again, it's awesome they were willing to do a chat at all.
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
logansean
logansean
18. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:31 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:31 PM EST
"Ok, then I'll start...Josh Friedman's quick wit really impressed me. That guy is a hoot! Show material aside, he dropped some pretty funny comments. Thomas too--I thought they were amazing!"
I'm really impressed by Josh's wit. I'm satisfied by many of their answers.
Do you find this valuable?    
Jameron4ever
Jameron4ever
19. RE: Was that awesome or what?
Feb 11 2009, 4:37 PM EST | Post edited: Feb 11 2009, 4:37 PM EST
"The chat was great, it's awesome that they're willing to do so. There were some good questions, there were some not so good questions. Only disappointing thing was quite a few people who got to ask multiple questions while some didn't get any in there. "
I agree, Schmacky. I think it would have been much more fair of the moderator to have limited the questions to one question from each contributor. If the chat had been conducted in that manner, more people and more good questions might have been included. Of course, I know the old adage, "Life isn't fair," but my reply to that always is, "True, but people should be."
Do you find this valuable?    
2 3 | Next