"Its you opinion, and it might be of a lot of vocal cliche haters on the internet, but the people that spend money worldwide on T3 movie and dvd sales spoke otherwise. So the people that count , made T4 happen and so
will be the same with T5 and 6. And the haters can complain, and watch a dvd rip because they don't fit in the
demographic that has a job and has expendable income and usually higher education that all count towards making
movies happen."

"T2 was absolutely chock full of corny one liners and just mind numbing cgi and explosions."

"T2 was "chock full" of mind-numbing cgi and explosions? What are you talking about? There were only 8 or so scenes with actual cgi and those were landmarks in special effects at the time. Not only that, but Cameron's use of practical effects are bar none the best in any action movie to date. It's ludicrous that you're attempting to make a case for T3 while deriding T2 as "mind-numbing.""

"The liquid terminator was cgi, he was the villain and he was used because it was very cool. If that was a small part of the movie your take on T2 is clueless. I'm not deriding T2 one bit, I was pointing out how petty haters like yourself spin cliches to suit their garbage. Take a statement and use it to bash T4 or T3 while looking like Joe internet critic and laud T2."

"You make a great point. It is somewhat confusing as to why WB seems content with leaving TSCC in the dust. The show may not have been a profitable endeavor for Fox, but it certainly was - and still is - for WB. They are making pure profit on those dvd and bluray sales. T4, on the other hand, has been a mixed venture for them. Sure, the movie is doing well internationally, but they split those profits with Sony *after* splitting ticket sales with theaters. Domestically, the movie was a critical and financial flop, so its hard to imagine that they will greenlight T5 any time soon."

"Its you opinion, and it might be of a lot of vocal cliche haters on the internet, but the people that spend money worldwide on T3 movie and dvd sales spoke otherwise. So the people that count , made T4 happen and so
will be the same with T5 and 6. And the haters can complain, and watch a dvd rip because they don't fit in the
demographic that has a job and has expendable income and usually higher education that all count towards making
movies happen."

"From wikipedia (with references). Make of it what you will:
"McG said the time displacement equipment and the T-1000 will be reintroduced in the fifth film: "I like the idea and the perspective for the next picture that you meet Robert Patrick the way he looks today, and he's a scientist that's working on, you know, improving cell replication so we can stay healthier and we can cure diabetes and do all these things that sound like good ideas, and to once again live as idealized expressions as ourselves."[8][9]

McG added the fifth film "is likely to be" about Connor himself timetravelling to 2011 to galvanize the world's forces against a Skynet attack, which would explore a "survivalist creature in our world doing his best to bring the world up to speed on an impending doom... and one could argue he meets his mother. I strongly suspect Linda Hamilton to be the star of the next film." McG also said the origin story they had in mind for the T-1000 would satirize the world's "obsession" with youth and aging,[11][12] and also described having "hunter killers and transports and harvesters and everything arriving in our time and Connor fighting back with conventional military warfare."[13] "

"I hope he includes Daleks in this one.
Sounds like it's something he might consider. "

".........It shows that the guy a) knows nothing of Terminator canon, and b) cannot direct anything but an action scene.

I won't be holding my breath waiting for that one."