Location: Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles Discussion Forum

Discussion: Terminators are Androids not CyborgsReported This is a featured thread

Showing 41 - 60 of 139  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last
CamDer
CamDer
40. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:22 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:22 PM EDT
"Don't by shy CamDer. if you want to post a comment about whether androids make better lovers than cyborgs, or vis versa, go right ahead. lol"
no no no... I posted a question that I noticed had already been addressed. So, I removed my question.
Do you find this valuable?    
CamDer
CamDer
41. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:28 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:30 PM EDT
"Don't by shy CamDer. if you want to post a comment about whether androids make better lovers than cyborgs, or vis versa, go right ahead. lol"
And personally (I'm gonna get dropped from alot of friend's lists for this) but in answer to the question you asked me, I think, if I had to choose, I believe that a cyborg would make a better intimate partner than a android would. (Not saying that I would have an intimate relationship with either, mind you)

*stands cringing, waiting for inevitable punishment for statement*
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
42. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:29 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:29 PM EDT
"no no no... I posted a question that I noticed had already been addressed. So, I removed my question."
Cool.
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
43. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:38 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:38 PM EDT
"Everything, human just sit around, eats, plays, xxx, sleeps... reproduce... let machines do all the work. how about that?

May be to the point we only need our spine and brain to be human, the rest is machine. No, we do not want to see Marcus Wrights alike running around, we human always afraid of other being that more powerful than normal human body capable. Nah, but if the strength of the machine structure is lest or equal normal human body then may be, like a normal human can hand-to-hand and defeat a machine then it's not a big deal, but machine like Terminator or Marcus? No way. "
So as long as the machine(s) are no more dangerous than a human we're okay? Sooner or later someone will design or reprogram one to exceed human ability - either the government will try to build a super soldier, or a criminal or terrorist will use one to commit a robbery or terrorism.
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
44. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:43 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:43 PM EDT
"And personally (I'm gonna get dropped from alot of friend's lists for this) but in answer to the question you asked me, I think, if I had to choose, I believe that a cyborg would make a better intimate partner than a android would. (Not saying that I would have an intimate relationship with either, mind you)

*stands cringing, waiting for inevitable punishment for statement*"
That's my thought too.
Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
45. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 12:48 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 12:58 PM EDT
"So as long as the machine(s) are no more dangerous than a human we're okay? Sooner or later someone will design or reprogram one to exceed human ability - either the government will try to build a super soldier, or a criminal or terrorist will use one to commit a robbery or terrorism. "
Yes, without weapons of course. lol
Well, human tends do all sort of thing they should not do.
So at the end, no machine. but we know that is not possible, we already having humanoid auto robot. soon or later humanoid machine using in none 'friendly society work' would show up. How long? No one know until they show up.

Do you find this valuable?    

MetalHunter
46. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:24 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:46 PM EDT
Okay, guys! Here is a *real* Autonomous Combat Unit (aka Cybernetic Soldier, aka Cybernetic Hunter/Killer, aka the Terminator):

http://www.kibertron.com/index.php?mod=pages&form=pages&action=show&pid=4
http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v1/body/KIBERTRON_body_v1_i06_1600x1200.jpg
http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v1/body/KIBERTRON_body_v1_f01.avi

Interesting to note that IT speaks Russian very well...

----------------
Characteristics
* height: 1.75m
* nominal weight: 90kg
* degrees of freedom: 100
* feeding: autonomous, electric
* autonomy: 12 hours of average load
* basic senses: vestibular apparatus; vision; hearing; olfaction; sensory systems for: orientation, distance, position, illumination, touch, pressure, temperature, humidity and self-diagnosis
* maximum speed of walking: 2 m/s
* maximum speed of running: 4 m/s
* intellect: similar to the human intellect, with severely limited reality of existence, through "living" in an approximated five-dimensional space
* level of intelligence: zone of experimentation
* body: kinematics, dynamics, weight-carrying capacity and resistance to external influences all similar to the human characteristics
-----------------

I think it will be very interesting to philosophize if IT is a cyborg or a android, when IT runs after you with 4 m/s and IT say: "Вы человек более!"

:P
Do you find this valuable?    
Maria17B
Maria17B
47. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:46 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:47 PM EDT
"This is the one thing that's always bugged me about the franchise. My biggest pet peeve. Cyborgs (cybernetic or cybernetically enhanced organisms) are by definition living things whose physiology has been modified in some way by technology. An android, on the other hand, is an anthropomorphic machine, something created to look and act human.

Marcus Wright is the first actual cyborg created by the franchise. Cameron, as much as we all adore her, is an android. Had Skynet done to Allison what it did to Marcus, Cameron would then be a cyborg. As her character stands she's basically a very unique machine, a sophisticated android able to emulate, and perhaps experience to some degree, human behavior.

Granted, cyborgs and androids are mostly fictional creations, but time will tell how long that remains the case. "
Right you are poppet.

A while back, when John said, "That's one for cyborgs" and Cameron said, "yes, that's one for us" I said on a facebook group that she is in fact not a cyborg and people were like, oh I wouldn't look into the terminology much, it's not important, at which point I thought they were all insane.
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
48. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:46 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:46 PM EDT
"Okay, guys! Here is a *real* Autonomous Combat Unit (aka Cybernetic Soldier, aka Cybernetic Hunter/Killer, aka the Terminator):

http://www.kibertron.com/index.php?mod=pages&form=pages&action=show&pid=4
http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v1/body/KIBERTRON_body_v1_i06_1600x1200.jpg

Interesting to note that IT speaks Russian very well...

----------------
Characteristics
* height: 1.75m
* nominal weight: 90kg
* degrees of freedom: 100
* feeding: autonomous, electric
* autonomy: 12 hours of average load
* basic senses: vestibular apparatus; vision; hearing; olfaction; sensory systems for: orientation, distance, position, illumination, touch, pressure, temperature, humidity and self-diagnosis
* maximum speed of walking: 2 m/s
* maximum speed of running: 4 m/s
* intellect: similar to the human intellect, with severely limited reality of existence, through "living" in an approximated five-dimensional space
* level of intelligence: zone of experimentation
* body: kinematics, dynamics, weight-carrying capacity and resistance to external influences all similar to the human characteristics
-----------------

I think it will be very interesting to philosophize if IT is a cyborg or a android, when IT runs after you with 4 m/s and IT say: "Вы человек более!"

:P"
Thanks for the link, MH. Is that a working model or a CGI drawing?
Do you find this valuable?    

MetalHunter
49. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:49 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:55 PM EDT
"Thanks for the link, MH. Is that a working model or a CGI drawing?"
It is actually a robot soldier, in the experiment stage, built by Russia and Bulgaria.

BTW. Somewhat interesting:
http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v2/hand/KIBERTRON_hand_v2_f01.avi
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
50. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:54 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:54 PM EDT
"It is actually a robot soldier, in the experiment stage, built by Russia and Bulgaria."
Cool.
Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
51. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 1:58 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 1:58 PM EDT
"It is actually a robot soldier, in the experiment stage, built by Russia and Bulgaria."
Well, waiting for when it in test phase then deploy phase.... interesting/scary thing to see.
Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
52. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:06 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:07 PM EDT
"BTW. Somewhat interesting:
http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v2/hand/KIBERTRON_hand_v2_f01.avi"
Very flexible but this is just CGI, if the real model can do that... imagines how fast it can snap neck...
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
53. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:11 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:11 PM EDT
I wonder if there's a girl-bot version? lol Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
54. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:13 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:13 PM EDT
"http://www.kibertron.com/data/galleries/KIBERTRON/v1/body/KIBERTRON_body_v1_f01.avi
"
if this unit walking like this then... how can it holding gun when moving? it's using its arms to balance when moving on those blocks, if its arms can't use for balance then what? fall over? lol
Do you find this valuable?    

Aaronalxzdr
55. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:15 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:15 PM EDT
Here's a thought - the social engines most likely to spur a renaissance in robotics technology are war and sex. Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
56. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:16 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:17 PM EDT
"I wonder if there's a girl-bot version? lol"
nah they would not bother to make girl-bot version right now, with that kind of Haze mask then no need for boy or girl. lol
Do you find this valuable?    
TK-MR
TK-MR
57. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:20 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:20 PM EDT
"Here's a thought - the social engines most likely to spur a renaissance in robotics technology are war and sex."
Yeah. that would be first then... damn that are enough to cover for all other need.
Do you find this valuable?    

MetalHunter
58. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 2:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 2:47 PM EDT
It is possible that you have the right ...

To be honest, I see the situation as follows:

United States: They see robots as some slaves (prejudices?) And are interested to build *slaves*. For example, autonomous combat planes, which have a master confirming mission. Above Iraq, now flying American robot planes, who choose the *target* but the target is *confirmed* by a remote man.

Japan: They are interested in civil way of Robotics, they will build the robot companions. Soon, in Japan you can buy a Robo-Girl companion. :P

Russia: They are interested to build cybernetic soldiers, to take decisions themselves and to be effective weapons on the front. Here will appear the Terminators and aerial Hunter/Killers.

And the Americans will buy Japanese Robo-Girls and they will be hide in tunnels, fearing Russian Terminators and aerial Hunter/Killers... ;)
1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
The_GodfatherSJP
The_GodfatherSJP
59. RE: Terminators are Androids not Cyborgs
Jun 22 2009, 3:17 PM EDT | Post edited: Jun 22 2009, 3:17 PM EDT
As to the original subject, here's the Webster's definition of both terms:

Android: a mobile robot usually with a human form

Cyborg: a bionic human

So, according to Webster's Cameron is a Android/Gynoid, not a Cyborg. The term Cyborg was coined in 1960 to describe an organic life form with a necessary relationship with machine parts, i.e. it needs it's "machine" portion to live.

Wikipedia specifically says : "Although frequently referred to onscreen as a cyborg, The Terminator might be more properly an android. While it has skin and blood (cellular organic systems), these serve mainly as a disguise and are not symbiotic with the machine components, a trait of true cyborgs. The endoskeletons beneath are fully functional robots and have been seen operating independently, especially during the future segments of the Terminator movies. The T-1000 (which is said to be made completely of a liquid metal) of Terminator 2: Judgment Day is definitely an android. "
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next > Last

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)