Location: Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles Discussion Forum

Discussion: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 21 - 40 of 70  |  Show  posts at a time
Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next
Losa78
Losa78
20. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 12:26 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 12:27 PM EST
This is so funny!

Is this a contest on who has the most effective auto-clickers, macros and such? Or which ones of them will allow reaching 1.000.000.000.000.000 votes first?
LOL

The fact you guys cheat, everybody cheats, and everybody know this is based solely on cheating and voting a gazilliion times kind of denies ANY KIND OF PURPOSE ON THIS WHATSOEVER, doesn't it?
What good can come of making some sort of an automated system to click endlessly on some internet link? What a waste...

Not to mention the ZERO relevance of the poll itself EVEN if there was no cheating involved... We've been through this so many times...
Do you find this valuable?    
Fermi
Fermi
21. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 12:46 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 12:46 PM EST
"Confirmed voting is working multiple times again, some guys mentioned macros\auto clickers - could you point me in the direction for something like that please?
Something I could leave running would be great but im just doing it manually atm"
Just refresh
http://www.transpond.com/transponder/vote/11177200000001/bo-0-0-n1?callback=__jsonp1&method=POST
if you use firefox download ReloadEvery
Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
22. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 12:54 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 12:54 PM EST
I just like the show so much that anything that gets the fact that the show was great and shouldn't have been cancelled noticed, I believe is worth trying - however slight the chance may be.

Your right the fact that you can vote repeatedly does make it an untrue result, the other side are using programs too so doing the same is the only way to compete.

If I didn't think it was worth it I wouldn't bother ^^
Do you find this valuable?    
Losa78
Losa78
23. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 1:03 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 1:03 PM EST
"I just like the show so much that anything that gets the fact that the show was great and shouldn't have been cancelled noticed, I believe is worth trying - however slight the chance may be.

Your right the fact that you can vote repeatedly does make it an untrue result, the other side are using programs too so doing the same is the only way to compete.

If I didn't think it was worth it I wouldn't bother ^^"
Ok, so what exactly do you guys think it's worth trying?

Even if TSCC "won" this poll (and the means for that we already know what they are), what do you guys think that would accomplish, seriously?

Is the show (or any show) "noticed" for "winning" a silly poll like this? How?!

By the time this poll ends, both Pushing Daisies and TSCC will have millions of votes. Will ANYBODY think that's even slightly possible or realistic at all?
Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
24. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 1:08 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 1:09 PM EST
I'd just love to see:
Best of 2009 @ TV.com 'Best show that was axed before it's time - Winner - Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles'

Rather that than another show.
Anythings better than nothing, right? Certainly doesn't hurt to try! ^^
I'm just doing ANYTHING I can to support the show, it may be desperate but so am I lol
Do you find this valuable?    

Predaluck
25. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 1:55 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 2:01 PM EST
Just use this link:

http://www.refreshthis.com/refreshthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.transpond.com%2Ftransponder%2Fvote%2F11177200000001%2Fbo-0-0-n1%3Fcallback%3D__jsonp1%26method%3DPOST&min=0&sec=0

Works great on Safari / Firefox, dunno about other browsers..
2  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you?    
Charley_Dixon
Charley_Dixon
26. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 8 2009, 10:51 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 8 2009, 10:51 PM EST
PD: 5.3M (30%)
TSCC: 3.6M (20%)
LM: 10K (0%)

I wonder where are the other 50%?
Do you find this valuable?    
indina4k11
indina4k11
27. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 5:12 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 5:12 AM EST
We've crept up to 21%. Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
28. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 12:37 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 12:37 PM EST
Seems to be stuck at 21%, Looks like were voting at the same speed :) Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
29. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 2:13 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 2:13 PM EST
Pushing Daisies: 8,740,219 votes (59%)
T: SCC - Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: 6,127,002 votes (41%)
Do you find this valuable?    
Fermi
Fermi
30. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 2:21 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 2:21 PM EST
"Pushing Daisies: 8,740,219 votes (59%)
T: SCC - Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: 6,127,002 votes (41%)"
good now tv.com has the percent right
Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
31. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 6:26 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 6:26 PM EST
I hope when Daisies gets to 9,999,999 it loops back to 0 lol :) Do you find this valuable?    
Fermi
Fermi
32. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 8:43 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 8:43 PM EST
"I hope when Daisies gets to 9,999,999 it loops back to 0 lol :)"
too bad that it didn't happen
PD 10,130,768 votes
TSCC 7,096,968 votes
Do you find this valuable?    
Caesis
Caesis
33. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 9:37 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 9:37 PM EST
I got a few tabs running.

Let's leave reloadevery on 24/7 if possible. Until tv.com freezes the poll again or something.
We are currently running at ~100 votes per second.
Do you find this valuable?    
Cammynator
Cammynator
34. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 9:42 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 9:42 PM EST
"I got a few tabs running.

Let's leave reloadevery on 24/7 if possible. Until tv.com freezes the poll again or something.
We are currently running at ~100 votes per second."
Next on tv.com: "Which fanbase cheats the most?" poll ;)
Do you find this valuable?    
Caesis
Caesis
35. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 9 2009, 10:10 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 9 2009, 10:12 PM EST
"Next on tv.com: "Which fanbase cheats the most?" poll ;)"
Is not cheating.

Their fault for having minimal voting security.
We've just taken the liberty of showing them the flaws in it.


I had to drop down my tabs to 2.
Was running 20 tabs, 18 on firefox, 2 on IE'd firefox.
If you have a single core processor and only 1GB of ram ... don't do that ... kaboom ...
Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
36. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 10 2009, 9:48 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 10 2009, 9:48 AM EST
How are you able to run multiple tabs?

T: SCC 9,082,417 votes 41%
Daisies 12,917,737 votes 59%
Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
37. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 10 2009, 10:07 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 10 2009, 10:07 AM EST
Thats strange, I just got some Poll Timeout error and now it asks for a username and password to vote.

Hope the poll hasn't finished yet
Do you find this valuable?    
Fermi
Fermi
38. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 10 2009, 11:45 AM EST | Post edited: Nov 10 2009, 11:45 AM EST
I can still vote Do you find this valuable?    
DarKStaR350z
DarKStaR350z
39. RE: Best of 2009 @ TV.com - need more voters!
Nov 10 2009, 2:26 PM EST | Post edited: Nov 10 2009, 2:26 PM EST
Not sure what the problem was, it is working fine now.
We are still 4,000,000 votes behind :(
Any tips for Internet Explorer users?
Do you find this valuable?    
Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)